- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 26,690
Nice to see you still dont get it. Alas, its a day to be happy about the team
FEATURE Rams and Alaric Jackson Agree on Extension
- Thread starter ottoman89
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
hotanez
NRA Member for Life
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
- Messages
- 7,783
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2012
- Messages
- 13,227
only thing he gets..is confused
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 36,473
- Name
- Stu
And yet, in his mind, he’s not. It all makes perfect sense.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,985
Good signing, so very glad they didn't listen to some of ROD and franchise tag him.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,446
- Name
- Josh Otto
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #66
Glad they listened to me when I start banging the table for them give him an extension towards the end of the '23 season.
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2010
- Messages
- 36,473
- Name
- Stu
So are we better off now or if we would have extended him last season? I’m guessing we could have gotten him cheaper but by how much? I think it was the right move even though it likely cost us millions.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,446
- Name
- Josh Otto
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #68
Better off now. He's not done ascending. Gave the Rams one more season (last year) to evaluate how they feel.
To me, it helped solidify they didn't do a bad deal.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 26,690
Stl2La
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2014
- Messages
- 4,501
How do you know he was willing to sign a contract extension last year?
Memphis Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,932
Did anyone really want him to be franchised instead of re-signed?
Or did they just realize that the franchise tag was just the last resort to keep him if they couldn't come to terms?
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,985
No there were people saying don't risk it franchise tag him we're going to pay him that much or more anyways.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,446
- Name
- Josh Otto
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,985
WestCoastRam
Legend
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 7,842
Methinks he also did not like the ballpark numbers his agent was getting from teams at the combine
Memphis Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,932
Ok. But I don't get it. Seems to me the risk (it) part would be losing him if they couldn't come to terms.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,446
- Name
- Josh Otto
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #77
I don't think that's the case. I think it's his love for the Rams, Stafford is back and the Rams have been patient with him with his suspensions and leave of absence for personal reasons.
He's repaying them in a way by taking less than he likely would've gotten in the open market.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,985
The Rams had a price in mind and it was obviously below the franchise tag price. It's also pretty obvious that they'd already had talks with him and his agent. Guessing that led them to know they didn't need to franchise tag him. So the worry and call around here for him to be franchised wasn't necessary and unrealistic.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,446
- Name
- Josh Otto
Memphis Ram
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,932
I see what you are saying as far as what may have appeared to happen.
It just sounded like you were saying that some ROD members wanted him franchised just for the sake of franchising him and with no regard to a possible re-signing instead of using the tag as a last resort just to make sure they keep him if they couldn't come to terms.