Matthew Stafford Contract Status

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Giants trade their #1 for Stafford. Rams package #3 and #26 and move up to #1 and take Cam Ward
If we did that, I wouldn't trade up at all. I understand why you're saying that tho as its a shot to take the QB if the future. Still think Stafford is coming back, but if that happened, I wouldn't totally be mad at it just would hate to lose a 1st rounder gained.
 
I think Stafford is likely to be back but it's not going to be an easy deal. He'll want a big guarantee for the next two years and Snead would prefer year to year. Still I think it get's done somehow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ottoman89
If we did that, I wouldn't trade up at all. I understand why you're saying that tho as its a shot to take the QB if the future. Still think Stafford is coming back, but if that happened, I wouldn't totally be mad at it just would hate to lose a 1st rounder gained.
We'd need that 1st rounder for our QB of the future. God knows Cam won't be it.

Sure sounds like with Cam, you're gonna have to reconstruct his throwing motion. There's only one QB who I can think of who that worked for, Josh Allen. And everyone was so surprised cause it had never really worked for a QB before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmgrovegnome
We'd need that 1st rounder for our QB of the future. God knows Cam won't be it.

Sure sounds like with Cam, you're gonna have to reconstruct his throwing motion. There's only one QB who I can think of who that worked for, Josh Allen. And everyone was so surprised cause it had never really worked for a QB before.
No matter which way you slice it, its always a risk drafting any QB since predicting how it'll work out is extremely difficult to do. The NFL game requires so much more of QBs than the college game.
 
No matter which way you slice it, its always a risk drafting any QB since predicting how it'll work out is extremely difficult to do. The NFL game requires so much more of QBs than the college game.
I think Arizona got it as right as you could without hitting right away on a generational talent. Pick a guy, suck, have a chance to pick an amazing guy (you could argue he's been good not great) and just throw away the old guy and start anew one year later.

Though, if they had gotten closer to a *500 record they would have been stuck with Rosen for a bit.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: El Chapo Jr
I think the social media team has to have stuff signed off on before posting so I would guess they would've had to had this DEFINITELY signed off on by people in the office. To me, it's a really good sign!
You must have liked that Pick 6 ?
 
  • Thread Winner
Reactions: ottoman89
You must have liked that Pick 6 ?
1739225973120.png
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: El Chapo Jr
Dudes a Hawkeye fan.
Got It! Thanks for the explanation.

I was confused because your response did not match Otto's post ... but your response was to Iowa Otto

The world once again makes perfect sense to me. Except for all the crazy-shit that gives me nightmares.
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: ottoman89
Status
Not open for further replies.