QB’s needing extensions
- By LACHAMP46
- RAMS / NFL TALK
- 2 Replies
I'd draft rookies...and build new offense around their skills....Joe Flacco....Cousins....and Bradford will show GM's the error in overpaying for a QB.
Every NFL Team's Biggest Remaining Offseason Needhttps://theramswire.usatoday.com/20...rams-roster-linebacker-depth-rookie-starters/
By: Cameron DaSilva
After the Los Angeles Rams were bounced from the playoffs last season, everyone’s eyes turned to the roster. Trumaine Johnson, Sammy Watkins, Lamarcus Joyner, Nickell Robey-Coleman and John Sullivan were among the many players set to hit free agency, bringing into question how the Rams would address potential roster holes.
Joyner, Robey-Coleman and Sullivan were all re-signed, while Los Angeles replaced Watkins and Johnson with three blockbuster trades. That left them needing very little heading into the 2018 NFL Draft.
Linebacker was obviously a top priority, as was offensive line depth, but the Rams didn’t seem overly concerned about the latter. After all, they waited until the fifth round to add any sort of linebacker, either inside or outside.
So where do the roster holes lie now that the draft is in the books? Really, there’s only one vacancy, and it’s at the position the Rams needed most heading into the draft: linebacker.
![]()
Mark J. Rebilas-USA TODAY Sports
At cornerback, they’re set with Marcus Peters, Aqib Talib and Robey-Coleman, among others. Their safety duo of Joyner and John Johnson is one of the best in the league. The defensive line needs no explanation with Aaron Donald, Ndamukong Suh and Michael Brockers topping the depth chart, while the offensive line is equally deep after the draft.
At wide receiver and running back, the Rams have a wealth of talent. At quarterback, Jared Goff isn’t going anywhere anytime soon, so there’s no concern under center, either.
As you can see, there aren’t any real holes on the roster outside of linebacker. Unfortunately, that’s a big vacancy, given the possibility that three new starters will be on the field in Week 1 after trading Alec Ogletree and Robert Quinn, as well as letting Connor Barwin walk. Mark Barron looks like the only returning starter, while the rest of the group will be sorted out in training camp.
We’re still in the very early parts of the offseason and there’s plenty yet to be determined, but you can’t help but wonder what Los Angeles will do at linebacker next season. Will it be rookies Micah Kiser or Tegray scales starting next to Barron? Or will Cory Littleton and Ramik Wilson hold off the first-year players to earn a starting job?
![]()
Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports
At outside linebacker, Samson Ebukam and Matt Longacre will have their work cut out for them when it comes to staving off Ogbonnia Okoronkwo. It’s likely one of the two will start in Week 1, but Okoronkwo has a good chance to take one of their jobs – likely Longacre’s.
Fortunately, the Rams bolstered their defensive line and secondary to make up for the holes at linebacker. If they can generate pressure up front and on the interior, it’ll make the lives of all four linebackers much easier. Inside ‘backers will be given more free runs to ball carriers, while the edge rushers will be afforded additional one-on-one matchups.
Los Angeles is in as good of shape as any team in the NFL, but until the linebacker position gets sorted out, all eyes will go to the middle of the defense.
And with that combination of versatility and talent, Franklin-Myers is poised to develop nicely under one of the top coordinators in the league in the Rams’ Wade Phillips. His impressive production last season — recording 13.5 tackles for loss and 3.5 sacks — and standout measurables give Phillips two important aspects to look forward to.
“I like him because he’s 6-foot-4, 283 pounds and runs a 4.7 first,” Phillips said with a laugh. “But he’s a development guy, a develop-quickly guy it looked like to me.”
Let us know when Kurt says something.I started this thread looking for commentary on what Montana had to say about QB's past and present and Quarterbacking in general! I guess that didn't work!!
NFL is dumb as hell, teams should be able to wear whatever they want.
I am not saying the Rams should be on the top of he list, but there are at least two teams on there that I just can't understand how they are rated higher than the Rams.
Mommy dresses little Tommy up real fancy.Looks like Brady has been getting his fashion tips from Steven Seagal.
![]()
Good luck with that....Her recommendation: “It’s time to rebrand these women as athletes, not sex symbols, so they can be treated with the respect they deserve. No more swimsuit calendars, online voting for your favorite cheerleader, or marketing the teams with creepy slogans like, ‘Football's Fabulous Females.’ NFL cheerleaders should be full-time employees or at the very least, better-paid part-time employees.
This could get ugly.....collusion cases are huge...HUGE monetary value..1. I think I don’t know if Eric Reid has a collusion case. I really don’t care. I just know if he’s not signed and in an NFL training camp in July, as an above-average, healthy 26-year-old safety, the NFL deserves what it gets if and when Reid can one day haul them into court.
If Warner can cap the progression from rejected Iowa recruit to NFL camp arm to grocery bagger to AFL star to NFL Europe to out-of-nowhere league and Super Bowl MVP to discarded veteran in St. Louis to placeholder for Eli Manning to late-career star in Arizona to retirement to TV to Canton to a return to the game in the short shadows of 50, the script will write itself.
He was suspended twice actuallyA) I don't recall Bailey ever being suspended for PED's!
B) Using the term " give him a shot" is a commonly used term, and your being over-analytical in presuming I did or didn't mean to use it as a pun!
Maybe we can trade those for 8 6th round picks.https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...ms-in-good-shape-for-2019-compensatory-picks/
Patriots, Rams in good shape for 2019 compensatory picks
Posted by Michael David Smith on May 9, 2018
![]()
Getty Images
The deadline has passed for any free agent signings that will affect the awarding of compensatory picks in next year’s NFL draft, and the Patriots and Rams are the teams that look to be in the best shape for 2019 compensatory picks.
Both the Patriots and the Rams are likely to be awarded two third-round picks next year, according to OverTheCap.com. That’s the best haul of any team.
The Patriots are always smart about getting compensatory picks, which are awarded to teams that lose more free agents, and especially more expensive free agents, than they sign. It’s no surprise to see the atop the list of compensatory picks.
But the Rams’ presence at the top may surprise a lot of people, because the Rams made offseason headlines by attracting a lot of players. How can the Rams get so many compensatory picks after an offseason dominated by headlines about the Rams bringing in big-name players?
Because those big-name players weren’t the unrestricted free agents who count toward the compensatory pick formula. Players who arrive in trades, like Marcus Peters and Aqib Talib, don’t count toward the compensatory pick formula. Nor do players who were cut by their previous teams, like Ndamukong Suh.
But players who leave your team as unrestricted free agents and sign big-money contracts with other teams do count toward the formula. The Rams lost two such players, Sammy Watkins and Trumaine Johnson, and that’s why they’re expected to get two third-round picks.
Other teams expected to get third-round compensatory picks next year include Washington (for losing Kirk Cousins), Minnesota (Case Keenum) and Carolina (Andrew Norwell).
The NFL doesn’t publish the full compensatory pick formula, and part of the formula relates to players’ performance during their first seasons with their new teams, so it’s possible that some of this could change before the compensatory picks are awarded for next year’s draft. But right now, the Patriots and Rams are looking good.
One of the reasons I love Countess. Love me some DBs that bring the wood man.
Back to Fleener, F the Saints and glad it didn't work out. I actually had hope that offseason that the Rams could add Fleener on an affordable deal until the Aints swooped in.
Still like Fleener on what he should be on: a cheap, prove-it contract. Bring him in, let him compete, if he doesn't show well cut him.