49'ers The San Francisco 49’ers Thread

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I would likely be mad if that was called on a Rams player. Can't blame them for the same on their guy, though I'd want it called for us playing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fanotodd
This 9ers teams lives on taking cheap shots; Warner and Debo are two of the biggest.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: hotanez
sloramfan said:
that was a BS call fellow rams fans... and the replay shows it..

no one ... and i mean no one, hates the 49r's more than i do...

he wasn't targeting with the helmet..he didn't make contact with the receivers head..

it was shoulderpad to shoulderpad....

go rams

slo
Click to expand...
Yeah, it wasn't helmet to helmet. To me it looked more like the forearm to the throat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamBall and Lunchbox
lets put an end to this with a simple google search

  1. Prohibited contact against a player who is in a defenseless posture is:
    1. forcibly hitting the defenseless player’s head or neck area with the helmet, facemask, forearm, or shoulder, even if the initial contact is lower than the player’s neck, and regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenselessplayer by encircling or grasping him
    2. lowering the head and making forcible contact with the crown or ”hairline” parts of the helmet against any part of the defenselessplayer’s body
    3. illegally launching into a defenseless opponent. It is an illegal launch if a player (i) leaves both feet prior to contact to spring forward and upward into his opponent, and (ii) uses any part of his helmet to initiate forcible contact against any part of his opponent’s body. (This does not apply to contact against a runner, unless the runner is still considered to be a defenseless player, as defined in Article 7.)
 
  • Thread Winner
  • Like
Reactions: fanotodd, RamBall and Elmgrovegnome
RhodyRams said:
lets put an end to this with a simple google search

  1. Prohibited contact against a player who is in a defenseless posture is:
    1. forcibly hitting the defenseless player’s head or neck area with the helmet, facemask, forearm, or shoulder, even if the initial contact is lower than the player’s neck, and regardless of whether the defensive player also uses his arms to tackle the defenselessplayer by encircling or grasping him
    2. lowering the head and making forcible contact with the crown or ”hairline” parts of the helmet against any part of the defenselessplayer’s body
    3. illegally launching into a defenseless opponent. It is an illegal launch if a player (i) leaves both feet prior to contact to spring forward and upward into his opponent, and (ii) uses any part of his helmet to initiate forcible contact against any part of his opponent’s body. (This does not apply to contact against a runner, unless the runner is still considered to be a defenseless player, as defined in Article 7.)
Click to expand...
Should also include 1 as well (bolded area)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lunchbox
OldSchool said:
Not from what I see off just the stills. Don't really care enough to watch more, agree to disagree I guess
Click to expand...
How about this shot that shows both feet off the ground when he leaped to hit the receiver

Per Rhody's #3 - that is a penalty

This is the last that I will say on the matter

1697644369710.png
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: OldSchool
Cant believe that there is even discussion on this one. With all the tricky tack penalty calls, this was obvious targeting and easily could result in injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmgrovegnome
RhodyRams said:
To me it was the launch that drew the flag
Click to expand...

I think it was a combo of the launch and their reputation.
Again, the 9ers might not be getting the benefit of the doubt on that play because of who they are—not above dirty cheap shots.
 
Sadly they'll still beat the Vikes by two TDs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back