The Athletic mock draft

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Wilson there at 57 would be crazy good luck he could move to LG and start day 1 or stay at RT and move Evans in to guard and free up Havenstein for a trade. Not sure I go CB that high but nice draft. Not being a subscriber I gotta guess there's a RB we could have taken there to fit better.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: André, Tron and Petrowsky
Limey said:
Has no trades but does all 7 rounds at

theathletic.co.uk

2020 Mock Draft 5.0: All seven rounds and 255 picks

Team needs, fit and the breadcrumbs all factor into the projections.
theathletic.co.uk theathletic.co.uk

2 (52) Higgins WR Clemson
2 (57) Wilson OT Georgia
3 (84) Robertson CB Louisiana Tech
3 (104) Harrison LB Ohio State
4 (126) Garvin Edge Miami, FL
6 (199) Kindley G Georgia
7 (234) Jackson WR Syracuse
Click to expand...
I definitely like the Higgins pick. I would rather upgrade LB before CB, but I guess that just depends on how the draft comes together.
 
Get Moss at #84 & this draft would be a slam dunk.
Ya we need a C, but if we get more talented at LG, that might compensate.
a decent K in round 7 would be nice too. But otherwise this is a decent draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: André and Ram65
No RBs? We don't need a wr what is the value of trading Cooks when he had a down year and could easily bounce back and we are taking a massive cap hit the answer is we are fine at WR. The goal should be to free up one more pick who can start on the line or at ilb or edge not wr.
 
  • Like
  • Not So Sure
Reactions: FrantikRam, jrry32 and JonRam99
This draft is kind of nuts tbh. They score Higgins which would be a coup at 52. But then take an OT who's a bit plodding in his movement in Wilson. We don't need another RT. Granted, I am sure some think Wilson could be a LT but I'm not one of them.

The round 3 picks are fine by me, but not taking a RB is worrisome. Seems like a really good haul though overall.
 
That would be a hell of a draft.

Merlin said:
This draft is kind of nuts tbh. They score Higgins which would be a coup at 52. But then take an OT who's a bit plodding in his movement in Wilson. We don't need another RT. Granted, I am sure some think Wilson could be a LT but I'm not one of them.

The round 3 picks are fine by me, but not taking a RB is worrisome. Seems like a really good haul though overall.
Click to expand...

I think we'd be taking Wilson to play OG. He's a mountain of a man with serious power. He's raw technically, but if he develops he could easily be a homerun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merlin and OldSchool
OldSchool said:
Wilson there at 57 would be crazy good luck he could move to LG and start day 1 or stay at RT and move Evans in to guard and free up Havenstein for a trade. Not sure I go CB that high but nice draft. Not being a subscriber I gotta guess there's a RB we could have taken there to fit better.
Click to expand...

Zack Moss went with the last pick in the third round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchool
I'm with everyone else about a RB, Either third-round pick could get Moss. That Wilson is humongous.

Don't know if Higgins will be around at 52 but, think Rams need a guy like him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrry32
Malibu said:
No RBs? We don't need a wr what is the value of trading Cooks when he had a down year and could easily bounce back and we are taking a massive cap hit the answer is we are fine at WR. The goal should be to free up one more pick who can start on the line or at ilb or edge not wr.
Click to expand...


And this is why I seriously doubt we draft a WR in the 2nd round. And I personally don't even think we will draft one in the 3rd.

Whether we roll with Malcolm Brown or draft someone, it's very likely we use two RBs frequently - after that we have 3 WRs and 2 TEs - that's 7 skill guys who will all see a ton of playing time. Obviously injuries can happen, so I wouldn't be opposed to WR - but McSnead have generally focused on certain positions at certain parts of the draft - I see RB/LB/OL as the focus on day 2 and WR/S/CB for day 3, with some potential overlap for S and OL.

I don't really want a WR drafted that high. No matter who it is they're not jumping Reynolds and if we're basically going to redshirt a WR, i trust McVay to have success with a 3rd/4th rounder
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back