That hit on Cooks

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Jacobarch

Legend
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
6,003
Name
Jake
It's unbelievable that the league is so hell-bent on protecting players but yet there was no call on the hit on Cooks. It was a clear call I don't understand how they didnt see that.

Isn't a personal foul like that in a enjectable foul spearing? Hope McVey sends a tape to the League of today's game. Terribly reffed
 
With the hit on cooks, the td that should have been reversed, the absolute lack of holding calls on Seattle, the clear first down we got that was reversed in the final minutes of the game...this was the worst officiating I've ever seen. The fact it was so blatant makes this win very unsatisfying.
 
With the hit on cooks, the td that should have been reversed, the absolute lack of holding calls on Seattle, the clear first down we got that was reversed in the final minutes of the game...this was the worst officiating I've ever seen. The fact it was so blatant makes this win very unsatisfying.

Should count as 2 wins as the Rams beat the shecocks and the officials.
 
That hit on Cooks was close to the hit in the SB that changed the game for the Pats. Might be the reason The Pats traded Cooks.
 
It was so blatant and yet the commentators acted as if it was a good hit.
To believe that had there not been another penalty on Seatle that it would have been a turnover is mind boggling.
I think that the worst part was that the commentators tried to play it as "even Pete Carroll was concerned over Cooks", when he was clearly talking to the refs over the penalty/turnover.
 
Was listening to Sirius and it was Seattle's home announcers. They said there was nothing spiteful about it and Thompson always goes in for hits like that. No remorse.

I didn't see the hit, but if so, Karma.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
It's unbelievable that the league is so hell-bent on protecting players but yet there was no call on the hit on Cooks. It was a clear call I don't understand how they didnt see that.

Isn't a personal foul like that in a enjectable foul spearing? Hope McVey sends a tape to the League of today's game. Terribly reffed
Listened to Rams radio and they were actively discussing the targeting call that should have been called and ejection for the hitter.
 
IMO, it will be reviewed by the league and a fine will be levied. It was a definite helmet to helmet hit, and the refs blew the call.

It actually wasn't H2H, but I'm not sure how Cooks was no longer a defenseless WR. He was turning up the field and had just started to protect himself when he was hit with a shoulder and forearm shiver right to the head. It was also quite clear that the DB was targeting his head.


I guarantee you if Russell Wilson got hit like that while scrambling, we would have been flagged.
 
It actually wasn't H2H, but I'm not sure how Cooks was no longer a defenseless WR. He was turning up the field and had just started to protect himself when he was hit with a shoulder and forearm shiver right to the head. It was also quite clear that the DB was targeting his head.


I guarantee you if Russell Wilson got hit like that while scrambling, we would have been flagged.


It wasn't H2H?
Either I am more blind than I thought or we are not watching the same video.