- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 6,804
All I'm getting from this is we have at least 3 more Stafford years. I'll take it.
He is not asking for more money: he is asking for more guaranteed money. The Horns restructure star players' contracts so much, often providing those players with more guaranteed money. This shouldn't be that hard for them..
stafford did the rams a solid when he took much less than he could have asked for when he signed the deal.
now he's seeing the crazy money some rather average qbs are getting and probably wants a little more tacked onto his contract. can't blame him. the team cap keeps growing.
that can be worked in with the guaranteed money he wants.
.
I think CBS Sports likes to stir the pot. I believe Pete Prisco is the senior guy there and we know how he likes to get the muck and state things authoritatively of which he has no idea...Especially concerning the Rams.I had no clue there was an issue. I sure hope the FO gets it resolved quickly. We don't need this kinda thing screwing up OTA's and beyond.
![]()
Rams' Matthew Stafford unhappy with contract: Team responds after report that QB wants reworked deal
The Rams might have a problem on their hands with Matthew Staffordwww.cbssports.com
Rams' Matthew Stafford unhappy with contract: Team responds after report that QB wants reworked deal
The Rams might have a problem on their hands with Matthew Stafford
By John Breech
19 hrs ago•3 min read
Getty Images![]()
The Los Angeles Rams could have a small problem developing this offseason and that's the fact that Matthew Stafford appears to be unhappy with his contract.
According to NFL.com, Stafford wants the team to adjust his contract so that it includes more guaranteed money over the final two years of the deal (2025 and 2026). As things currently stand, Stafford has $31 million in guaranteed money coming his way for the 2024 season, but he has nothing assured to him after that. With the way the contract is currently set up, the Rams could easily move on from Stafford following the 2024 season and it seems that he'd like some assurances that the team plans to stick with him.
Rams coach Sean McVay and general manager Les Snead were asked about the situation on Friday following the third round of the NFL Draft and they mostly danced around the issue. First, McVay was asked if the report was accurate about Stafford not being happy with his deal.
"I've had good dialogue with Matthew," McVay said, via quotes from the team. "We'll keep those things in house, but he's been working with our guys and we'll keep those things in house."
McVay and Snead were then asked if they thought the team would be able to "find a solution for the contract issue" and they basically ducked the question.
"We're definitely jacked to have Matthew as our QB," Snead said.
If Stafford's truly unhappy, he could skip OTA's this spring and McVay was asked what he thought about that possibility.
"We're going to take it a day at a time. We'll see," McVay said. "So we're going to try to figure it out. There's nothing that's more important than making sure that he feels appreciated and he knows how much we love him and want him to lead the way. I think that commitment that I think he wants to have can be reciprocated and we want to work towards figuring that out."
In summary: They made no promises that they'd fix the contract to Stafford's liking and they seem well aware that he might skip OTAs if nothing is done. That being said, McVay did point out that Stafford has been in the building working with the team over the past couple of weeks.
Stafford signed a four-year, $160 million extension with the team in March 2022, just one month after leading Los Angeles to a Super Bowl win over the Cincinnati Bengals. The win came just 13 months after Stafford was shockingly traded from Detroit to L.A. in a deal that was agreed to in January 2021. In three seasons with the Rams, Stafford has led the Rams to the playoffs twice, including their Super Bowl-winning season in 2021.
If the Rams are hesitant to add money to Stafford's contract, it could because of the quarterback's recent injury history. Although he was an iron man in Detroit, he's been battling injuries over the past two seasons, including 2022 when he missed with games.
Although Stafford doesn't have any guaranteed money coming his way for the final two years of the deal, that could change over the next few months even if the two sides don't rework the contract. Stafford is slated to have a base salary of $27 million in 2025 and $10 million of that will become fully guaranteed at some point in 2024, according to a breakdown for the contract from PFT.
The 36-year-old will also have another $5 million become fully guaranteed on the third day of the league year in 2025, which means he'd have a total of $15 million in guaranteed money coming his way in 2025 assuming nothing changes between now and then. If Stafford is the starter in 2024 and he got cut after the season, he'd walk away . Isn't Pete Prisco the head of the Sports Newwith a $10 million consolation.
The Rams have already proven they'll move on from a quarterback if they think it's time -- they traded away Jared Goff in the deal that brought Stafford to L.A. -- so it's no too surprising to see that Stafford wants some financial assurances that he will be the QB of the future in Los Angeles.
But the guaranteed money makes the Rams commit to staying the course through 2026. When these contracts are made by teams, they mostly want a way to dump a guy after a few years with little to no consequence. The last two years are often fantasy numbers with a balloon payment that a team never intends to honor.That still means he wants to change the contract that he signed.
Seems like a simple fix to me. If Stafford’s worry is being let go and not making the money promised in his contract and the Rams are worried of guaranteed money walking out the door in retirement, why not just install a no cut clause into the contract. Everything is fixed.![]()
Jaxson DartBut if I'm the Rams I would definitely target QB in the next draft.
There are 4 QBs on the Rams RosterOr guarantee the money with a retirement clause… add the no cut clause if necessary. I can’t imagine it’s too difficult to figure out. I’m just surprised that got out during the draft.
Also surprised we didn’t draft or sign a QB. Even as a camp arm… we aren’t the Falcons is so many ways…
Indeed. He is my huckleberry.Jaxson Dart
There are 4 QBs on the Rams Roster
Mathew Stafford
Jimmy Garoppolo
Stetson Bennett
Dresser Winn
Who did they need to sign?
Quinn Ewers is my choice. With a late first, I'd definitely take him, reunite him with Whittington.Jaxson Dart
I wouldn't be surprised if they waited for cuts and p/u a guy that has a couple 3 yrs of experience. Seems to be their plan this year.Rams and Stafford will work to a solution. Hopefully.
But if I'm the Rams I would definitely target QB in the next draft. Not one of the guys who slot at the top. Rather one of the round 2-5 types who have the minimum tools but need dev time.
Now if by some miracle Bennett is a revelation in preseason then going with him is fine. But I think it is important to get McVay a young signal caller they can start developing and preferably one with starter potential.
I'm thinking that Ewers, Sanders and maybe Beck will be the "top" guys coming out, while Dart would be in the 2nd tierQuinn Ewers is my choice. With a late first, I'd definitely take him, reunite him with Whittington.
Stetson is the kind of kid that seems to find miracles so we'll see.Rams and Stafford will work to a solution. Hopefully.
But if I'm the Rams I would definitely target QB in the next draft. Not one of the guys who slot at the top. Rather one of the round 2-5 types who have the minimum tools but need dev time.
Now if by some miracle Bennett is a revelation in preseason then going with him is fine. But I think it is important to get McVay a young signal caller they can start developing and preferably one with starter potential.
Ewers is a pussy.