- Joined
- Dec 29, 2010
- Messages
- 6,381
- Name
- Tim
Sean McVay discussion thread
- Thread starter So Ram
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 16,476
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #222
Well - Sean Mcvay sort of kiss managed the CINNCY game. Could have a serious effect on the 2023 season.
Mattew Stafford when he tries to do to much & make things happen things don’t seem to workout as well. I go back to The Superbowl year & know that
he can be Great.
6 points in the first half & that Tutu Atwell’s heel touching was wrong.
Story is is that who cares ? We move on,but the legacy continues.
Mattew Stafford when he tries to do to much & make things happen things don’t seem to workout as well. I go back to The Superbowl year & know that
he can be Great.
6 points in the first half & that Tutu Atwell’s heel touching was wrong.
Story is is that who cares ? We move on,but the legacy continues.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 12,957
oldnotdead
Legend
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
- Messages
- 5,406
Every coach and every player has their strengths and weaknesses. Games like this have happened in the past and will happen in the future. As long as the wins exceed the losses so what. We accept Sean's issues just like we accept Stafford's issues. Sometimes its clear neither one can help themselves. People are who they are and we simply accept it or not.
One thing that was made clear was the need for a true RB who not only is a strong RB, but can block and catch. The only RB with that skill set is Freeman. So either accept that reality and play Freeman or acknowledge they might have made the wrong choice between Akers and Williams. Regardless, they need to stop looking at him as a receiver. Williams is 17 receptions on 31 targets with 2 crucial drops and one resulting in an INT and the second one almost being one. Akers by comparison was 27 receptions on 35 targets, i.e. 77% for Akers and 55% for Williams. The only difference being Williams being a better pass blocker.
If being a receiver is that important to the Rams then it should be next man up, Evans and Freeman. Royce has 85 receptions on 107 targets (79%) and he's bigger and faster and has passed blocked. Ronnie Rivers is a small RB at 5'9" a tad slower than Freeman and has only one reception for 4 yards this year. More importantly he's never shown he can run with power.
So McVay can stick with Williams and just not throw to him, or see what he has in Evans and Freeman. This is why I would be surprised if they didn't at least explore a trade for Taylor. If they can get him for a couple of non-first round picks I think they should.
One thing that was made clear was the need for a true RB who not only is a strong RB, but can block and catch. The only RB with that skill set is Freeman. So either accept that reality and play Freeman or acknowledge they might have made the wrong choice between Akers and Williams. Regardless, they need to stop looking at him as a receiver. Williams is 17 receptions on 31 targets with 2 crucial drops and one resulting in an INT and the second one almost being one. Akers by comparison was 27 receptions on 35 targets, i.e. 77% for Akers and 55% for Williams. The only difference being Williams being a better pass blocker.
If being a receiver is that important to the Rams then it should be next man up, Evans and Freeman. Royce has 85 receptions on 107 targets (79%) and he's bigger and faster and has passed blocked. Ronnie Rivers is a small RB at 5'9" a tad slower than Freeman and has only one reception for 4 yards this year. More importantly he's never shown he can run with power.
So McVay can stick with Williams and just not throw to him, or see what he has in Evans and Freeman. This is why I would be surprised if they didn't at least explore a trade for Taylor. If they can get him for a couple of non-first round picks I think they should.
snackdaddy
Who's your snackdaddy?
- Joined
- May 6, 2014
- Messages
- 13,527
- Name
- Charlie
McVay did make mistakes. Throwing 3 straight times near the goal line was one. But when Jackson went down it changed the whole complexion of the game. Stafford was under heavy pressure just about every play because Thomas was overmatched and overwhelmed. He had no chance. If you want to fault McVay here he shoulda had someone helping on the pass rusher. Maybe a tight end chipping him to slow it down and give Stafford and extra second?
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 16,476
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #227
LMAO -Kiss management is frowned upon now. You don't want to be in HRs office.
That’s good. Yeah ,that wouldn’t be a good look.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2014
- Messages
- 16,476
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #228
Rock & Roll baby is here to stay!!
Yes, but KISS was HORRIBLE simplistic, repetitive music.
Remember when those ugly fucks took off their makeup and made that Lick It Up video ?
Bet a lot of chicks were like, nah.
Remember when those ugly fucks took off their makeup and made that Lick It Up video ?
Bet a lot of chicks were like, nah.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 10,502
Nah fam, you can miss me with that shit. I was Kiss Army as a 5 year old!!
Also, I am guessing that band had more "chicks" in an average week than most have had over a lifetime.
Never been able to stand KISS. Its like we were supposed to like them growing up. But if you really listen to them, terrible.
Not sure if the letters KISS stand for what some say either. They just are not good.
Groupies ? who cares. Lots of skanks laid down for rock bands.
Pupped
Legend
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2021
- Messages
- 9,128
- Name
- Pupped
They were fun.. they were rock n roll. Not the tightest or most original music, but.. again.. fun.
Music can be a lot of things.. that's why it's so awesome. Even "bad" songs can be a lot of fun.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,165
Never liked KISS, if you knew one line, you knew all the words in the whole song.
Yep, all you needed to know was "I want to Rock and Roll all night and party everyday".
Garbage.
I have like a 15,000$ stereo which for a regular working guy is quite nice.
Bands like KISS get exposed on a fine stereo. And some bands you never would think paid great attention in the studio.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 10,502
15k for a stereo? Lolz. So, do you play an instrument? Ever been in a band?
I'm not saying Kiss was original or even that they were above average musicians. As a kiddo in the 70s, I thought they were the coolest. I was a huge Ace Frehley fan and I am not apologetic about it, haha.
I find it funny when people shit on a band like Kiss, or these days I guess Nickleback. Those bands have sold a bazillion records, so they must not be as horrible as the "audiophiles" say they are.
Londoner
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2023
- Messages
- 3,475
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2010
- Messages
- 10,502
The spice girls weren't a band. They were a corporate entity that had songs written for them. You ever write a song? Play it and produce it? If so, can we hear it?
Opinions are like assholes. That band was a fun part of my youth. Not saying they are in my current rotation, but not going to apologize for my Fandom either. The fact that a gif of them has triggered this much discussion speaks for itself.