Robert Quinn is DPOY

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
And he just turned 24 today. He still has so many years of dominance left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -X-
These videos are like crack.
You're going to have me scratching sores on my neck in anticipation for the season to start.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: -X-
GINllK8.gif
 
This is the sort of thing I get enthused about. We have others that are promising also.

If he repeats the season he just had, I see NO one who compares currently with him.

The playoffs have an impact on the voting for these things so often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -X-
Hard to believe that Mathis got 19.5 sacks legitimately last year. That was 8 more than he ever had in his 11 year career.

We are talking about a 32 year old player having a 70% increase in sacks over his best ever performance. Mathis was no better than a 10 to 11 sack guy for 10 years, then suddenly at age 32, he becomes superman. I don't buy it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluesjoc
I can't wait to see him and CL crashing the corners with Donald pushing the pocket from the inside. Opposing QBs aren't going to have anywhere to hide! You hear me crapondick? Wussle?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdw and The Rammer
Hard to believe that Mathis got 19.5 sacks legitimately last year. That was 8 more than he ever had in his 11 year career.

We are talking about a 32 year old player having a 70% increase in sacks over his best ever performance. Mathis was no better than a 10 to 11 sack guy for 10 years, then suddenly at age 32, he becomes superman. I don't buy it.
Kind of sounds like Barry Bonds. Athletes don't all of a sudden start doing new things, late in their career, without help. Even a spectacular athlete like Bonds.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdw
Hard to believe that Mathis got 19.5 sacks legitimately last year. That was 8 more than he ever had in his 11 year career.

We are talking about a 32 year old player having a 70% increase in sacks over his best ever performance. Mathis was no better than a 10 to 11 sack guy for 10 years, then suddenly at age 32, he becomes superman. I don't buy it.
And he is suspended for the first four games because he violated the performance enhancing drug policy. He claims he was only taking fertility supplements. Right! He should be officially stripped of that title and it should in turn be officially given to Quinn.
 
Did they strip Brian Cushing of the DPOY when he tested positive?
 
They had a re-vote and he won that vote too.
They should re-vote in this case too. I don't buy his story. There's a list of prohibited substances. It's on the list. Before you take meds, you check the list. Not rocket science. He was trying to pull a fast one and got busted. Like Pow said, it reminds me of Bonds' career resurgence.
 
They should re-vote in this case too. I don't buy his story. There's a list of prohibited substances. It's on the list. Before you take meds, you check the list. Not rocket science. He was trying to pull a fast one and got busted. Like Pow said, it reminds me of Bonds' career resurgence.

Luke Kuechly won the DPOY. Why would they revote? Kuechly wasn't on PEDs. They can't do anything now about Mathis. The only thing they can possibly do is void Mathis' Deacon award, but that probably won't happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rdw
Luke Kuechly won the DPOY. Why would they revote? Kuechly wasn't on PEDs. They can't do anything now about Mathis. The only thing they can possibly do is void Mathis' Deacon award, but that probably won't happen.
I guess you can't exactly re-vote for who had the most sacks...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDYVKX and rdw
Luke Kuechly won the DPOY. Why would they revote? Kuechly wasn't on PEDs. They can't do anything now about Mathis. The only thing they can possibly do is void Mathis' Deacon award, but that probably won't happen.
I demand a re-vote anyway. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDYVKX and rdw
Imagine having an incentive in your contract saying if you lead the NFL in sacks you get a huge bonus, and then you miss it because another guy cheated.