I don't know the details, but remember the players didn't have access to team facilities, which includes the team trainers that knew him far better than someone he might hire in the interim. Very likely, this preference for dealing with who he was familiar with may have led Manning to delay the surgery, hoping the lockout wouldn't last too long. That has now backfired big time on the Colts.JdashSTL said:I still dont understand how he was affected so bad by the lockout. He really couldnt find ANYONE to look at his neck during the lockout???
So why did he wait? Can't be money. He knew he was looking at surgery, so it wasn't ignorance. He was a free agent in any case, but he didn't intend to sign anywhere else. Could he have thought there wouldn't be football this year?RamFan503 said:I find it hard to believe that for an issue like this, Manning was waiting to be able to consult team doctors. These guys go out and hire their own doctors all the time. Certainly someone with the heritage of Peyton would be able to hire the best surgeon in the world to look at his neck during the lockout. Good thing the Colts will have $18 million wearing a baseball cap.
Ram Quixote said:So why did he wait? Can't be money. He knew he was looking at surgery, so it wasn't ignorance. He was a free agent in any case, but he didn't intend to sign anywhere else. Could he have thought there wouldn't be football this year?RamFan503 said:I find it hard to believe that for an issue like this, Manning was waiting to be able to consult team doctors. These guys go out and hire their own doctors all the time. Certainly someone with the heritage of Peyton would be able to hire the best surgeon in the world to look at his neck during the lockout. Good thing the Colts will have $18 million wearing a baseball cap.
Nothing really makes sense. I know there are people who don't like to go into major decisions with strangers, and Manning has always seemed to me to be a guy who prefers his routines. I wouldn't say this is right, but to me it just seems less wrong.
RamsFan4Life said:If what they have been saying for the last month or so is true..........
No how, no way Peyton Manning isn't under center on Sept. 11, 2011 at Houston
Then why do they sign RETIRED Kerry Collins and give him 4 million dollars to boot?
JdashSTL said:RamsFan4Life said:If what they have been saying for the last month or so is true..........
No how, no way Peyton Manning isn't under center on Sept. 11, 2011 at Houston
Then why do they sign RETIRED Kerry Collins and give him 4 million dollars to boot?
The Collins signing is preparing for worst case scenario and he would provide an upgrade over Painter or Orlovsky. The problem I have with that is why wait until now to sign him? Why not try to sign him or some other vet right after FA started so they can get in camp right away?? Collins should have no problem picking up the playbook but hes gonna need more time to get the timing, chemistry, and rhythm down with their offense. This also raises concern over them not doing a good enough job to find a decent backup QB for Manning. The Pats do a good job with that, and so do the Eagles. Being a backup QB in Indy is very different from any other situation. Its Mannings system, hes the coach on the field. Theres no other offense more dependant on their QB.
This is a golden opportunity for the Texans to take advantage of if Manning isnt playing them week 1.
JdashSTL said:Well Im sure the Texans will make the necessary preparations in case Manning does start. How would you like to be Jim Caldwell and possibly have to tell Manning that hes not starting week 1? That would suck lol.