RamsJunkie
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 2,117
How much of them moving Kupp is that Kupp was upset (not like diva upset) that he was no longer the 1st option in the passing game (this was reported) and Rams see him only as option 3 (Charles Robinson implied that Kupp dropped to 3rd option behind Robinson by end of year and I would not be surprised if he wasn't the 3rd read on many passing concepts by the end of the season).Not everyone disagrees with you; and some posters just enjoy "What If" discussions.
I think a high majority of ROD posters want Stafford back, and hope the Rams and Stafford work things out.
I beileve things will be worked-out, unless Stafford's demands are truly unreasonable.
In the case of Kupp, you will see several posts from me that express surprise about the Rams' decision to move-on now. My opinion is mostly based on the salary cap. Kupp is a huge cap hit in 2025 (almost $30M). However, regardless of whether the Rams trade him or release him, a majority of that amount will STILL hit their cap. I would rather they move-on next off-season when the cap savings are significant and the Dead-$ is much lower.
They could include Adams in that scenario and put together something extraordinary, however, if Stafford goes I believe the plan is James Richard Garoppolo, not Aaron Charles Rodgers.What kind of team could they put around Aron Rodgers if they trade Stafford and Rodger’s comes to play for vet minimum just to try to win another ring and say fuck off?
take all my likesBrady hosting Matt at his home. Hmmmmmmm. In Montana. Tom's doing some fishing.
Yep they ran into each other the same way Lewinski ran into Bill's schlong.Similar to McVay and Stafford in Cabo.
Who bought that dress? What a conversation piece at the dinner party when company comes over.Yep they ran into each other the same way Lewinski ran into Bill's schlong.
Excuse you! Are you saying women like me are high-maintenance?![]()
![]()
Definitely need a franchise QB to be in a SB window. Stafford's individual window requires year-to-year re-evaluation. If his arm wears down (or he has any major injury) its over for him.I don't see any super bowl window without a QB. This draft is shit and the free agents are meh.
That's fine by me as I obviously disagree with yours lol. That's how these things work. I hope I'm wrong by the way. My preference is to keep Stafford but if not, I hope we take the best haul we can get in a trade.I watched that interview and I disagree with your take as well.
He never had sexual relations with that woman.Yep they ran into each other the same way Lewinski ran into Bill's schlong.
They could include Adams in that scenario and put together something extraordinary, however, if Stafford goes I believe the plan is James Richard Garoppolo, not Aaron Charles Rodgers.
Here's Brady when he ran into StaffordYep they ran into each other the same way Lewinski ran into Bill's schlong.