John Johnson III or Troy Reader?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Well I don't think we need either in the starting lineup, so the question then becomes who helps more on special teams. I don't think Reeder or Johnson really helps very much overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmgrovegnome and shovelpass
DzRams said:
Chicken or egg?

Are they playing the safeties more because Reeder is out? The increase in safety snaps did dramatically increase around the time Reeder went down.
Click to expand...
Possibly, but it could also be a young defense figuring out what works. They have but I wouldn't say dramatic. All season long they've used a 3rd safety a good amount. Week 1 Johnson played 62% as the 3rd safety. Week 3 a 4th safety starts getting some playing time.

The backend of the defense has done a lot of shuffling throughout the season to figure out the best lineup(s). Add in the emergence of McCollough, and Kinchens after some early struggles. Even when Reeder was playing they started pulling him off of the field more and more on passing downs.

And if they are playing this way because of Reeder's absence, are they going to change back if he's activated?
 
  • Like
Reactions: thirteen28
This could just come down to who is healthy? Both are "week to week". Johnson has been out since week 3.
 
I would go with JJ, he adds more.

And the ILBs have actually played *better* since Reeder went down. Speights is starting to get a handle and Rozeboom seems to do better without Reeder in their.

I get the concern about depth, but there are two designations if we can make the playoffs, and Reeder is less likely than JJ to be a difference maker that gets us there.
 
shovelpass said:
Possibly, but it could also be a young defense figuring out what works. They have but I wouldn't say dramatic. All season long they've used a 3rd safety a good amount. Week 1 Johnson played 62% as the 3rd safety. Week 3 a 4th safety starts getting some playing time.

The backend of the defense has done a lot of shuffling throughout the season to figure out the best lineup(s). Add in the emergence of McCollough, and Kinchens after some early struggles. Even when Reeder was playing they started pulling him off of the field more and more on passing downs.

And if they are playing this way because of Reeder's absence, are they going to change back if he's activated?
Click to expand...
Yeah, Reeder's snaps had decreased from 100% in early weeks to 90% his last game in week 7.

What was consistent in all of the first 7 weeks is that Shula was playing two ILB sets most of the time. I've mentioned before in another thread but that was my huge issue with Shula. The ILBs are not our best talent. I kinda feel he was forced to adapt to losing a guy who was playing 90% of the snaps. And we're better for it!

But just like they reverted to the original plan in playing Jonah Jackson over Limmer, I fear they may go back to a lot of two ILB sets and Reeder snaps if he's activated. I'm seriously hoping not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shovelpass and TheTackle
Rozeboom played 64% of the snaps vs New England, Speights played 55%, Hummel played 4%. So they played together some in that game.
 
Is this even a question?

JJ without a doubt.

I don't want to see Reeder with a Ram jersey on the sideline again.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: majrleaged
McVay pretty much answered this question in his press conference on Monday.

And the answer is ... It Depends, and We'll See.

Since the Rams would have to choose between activating either John Johnson or Troy Reeder (both may be close), McVay commented about need at either Safety or Inside Linebacker should the Rams lose a player at one of those positions. It suggested that the Rams may wait a week or two after the players are ready, to see if there is more of a need because of performance or injury.

That makes sense if the Rams are satisfied with what they are currently getting at Safety and ILB.

He also acknowledged that the limitation of activating just one (without exposing the other to waivers) was on the organization for making too many Return From IR Designations early in the Season. I love the guy for acknowledging that.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: Alaskan Ram
Allen2McVay said:
McVay pretty much answered this question in his press conference on Monday.

And the answer is ... It Depends, and We'll See.

Since the Rams would have to choose between activating either John Johnson or Troy Reeder (both may be close), McVay commented about need at either Safety or Inside Linebacker should the Rams lose a player at one of those positions. It suggested that the Rams may wait a week or two after the players are ready, to see if there is more of a need because of performance or injury.

That makes sense if the Rams are satisfied with what they are currently getting at Safety and ILB.

He also acknowledged that the limitation of activating just one (without exposing the other to waivers) was on the organization for making too many Return From IR Designations early in the Season. I love the guy for acknowledging that.
Click to expand...
If we're gonna lose someone to waivers, it's gonna be JJIII.
Activate JJIII!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elmgrovegnome
I can't believe I'm saying this but Troy Reeder. He's really clicked the last 2-3 weeks.
 
  • HaHa
Reactions: JonRam99
Allen2McVay said:
McVay pretty much answered this question in his press conference on Monday.

And the answer is ... It Depends, and We'll See.
Click to expand...
That isn't an answer. That is typical McVay coach speak where he dodges the question.

An answer would be him saying Johnson. Barring our ILBs getting hurt that would also be an accurate answer.
 
Merlin said:
That isn't an answer. That is typical McVay coach speak where he dodges the question.

An answer would be him saying Johnson. Barring our ILBs getting hurt that would also be an accurate answer.
Click to expand...

I actually think he doesn't know the answer at the moment. With only one spot left to activate it really does depend on health and performance. I like McVays approach on this, because the ILB room is very thin even tho they are playing better, and the Safety room is very deep, and performing somewhat ok. If JJIII was a CB then yes I'd say they would probably would cut loose Reeder and see where the chips fall. It's a tough spot because the Rams have some serious deficiencies in the backfield while JJIII might provide some much needed leadership and communication, the Rams are incredibly thin at off ball LB's. If Speights or Rose were to go down and Reeder not be there as a backup role the Rams would be in serious trouble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen2McVay
Jacobarch said:
I actually think he doesn't know the answer at the moment.
Click to expand...
The answer is "Johnson, unless our ILBs suffer a rash of injury." That is also what McVay will do. It is what he would say if you removed coach speak.
 
I’m going to preface my answer with the NFL is a tough gig and as often described Not For Long. Add to that Reeder appears to give 100% and by all accounts is a good teammate.

With that said, IMO I don’t see Reeder starting if he were to come back and the Rams could find someone better than Reeder off the street if they needed to add a ILB due to Rose/Speights injury. I don’t feel the same about JJIII.
 
Last edited:
Tano said:
Is this even a question?

JJ without a doubt.

I don't want to see Reeder with a Ram jersey on the sideline again.
Click to expand...
Does anybody know what's going on with John Johnson III?
He was getting a few snaps in last year when he was not injured and I don't see him on anybody's roster, including ours. Would be a good veteran presence back there in my opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back