- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 404
- Name
- Will
3 picks.PowayRamFan having trouble counting:
Starting to doubt him as a possibility. OL and secondary with the first 2 picks, IMO.
"Aaron Donald to the St. Louis Rams? Might be a pretty good fit there..."
Yep.
Agreed. This would make our Dline a problem
I think the opposing QB would just use his one second to throw a short pass to any of his many open receivers and calmly march down the field to score. Much like what happened last year.RamzFanz forgetting what we learned last year:
Clowney - Donald.
This board would erupt with hate, but OMG! QBs would get hiked the ball, turn, and run away screaming like girls while their O line all faked injuries.
It's just more options for them the way I see it, and I'm not disagreeing with you regarding whether or not Donald is the best fit, as I think Hageman would be a better fit and long term solution, but of course I'm no scoutWe just got Carrigan. That would have been Donald's spot. Unless they realm wanna pull Langford AND Brockers on third down, I don't see it.
Denard or Dix here makes way more sense.
We just got Carrigan. That would have been Donald's spot. Unless they realm wanna pull Langford AND Brockers on third down, I don't see it.
Denard or Dix here makes way more sense.
We just got Carrigan. That would have been Donald's spot. Unless they realm wanna pull Langford AND Brockers on third down, I don't see it.
Denard or Dix here makes way more sense.
I think the opposing QB would just use his one second to throw a short pass to any of his many open receivers and calmly march down the field to score. Much like what happened last year.
So why doesn't that logic work for getting a DE/DT?RamzFanz pointing out the obvious:
The Rams have 10 other draft picks.
So why doesn't that logic work for getting a DE/DT?