OFFICIAL 2023 NFL trades, cuts, free agents, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Status
Not open for further replies.



download.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • HaHa
Reactions: Ram Ts and CGI_Ram
Too much for a running QB that has only had 1 good year, behind an insanely elite o-line, and has already sustained an injury to a throwing arm. Small sample size. Let's see how defences adjust. And I like Hurts and think he will be very good for a long time. But I would be nervous with this contract. I think he proves better than Goff but agree it is similar in terms of paying a huge amount arguably too early. Could burn the Eagles.
 
Stafford: "I'm not a human JUGS machine like I was when I was 25."

Rams Bloggers: "Should Rams look into replacing Matthew Stafford with JUGS machine?"
 
Sounds like the Goff deal after the Rams lost in the SB. Really don’t think he has been any better than Goff was leading up to what was a bad deal for the team.
Man, I don’t know about that for Hurts.

Then again… His 2022 was pretty darn solid with 22-6 TD/INT ratio.
 
Man, I don’t know about that for Hurts.

Then again… His 2022 was pretty darn solid with 22-6 TD/INT ratio.
I very good, not great season for Hurts pretty much the same thing Goff had in that SB run (Not stat specific) and Goff didn’t have the shoulder injury.

It will be interesting to see how that contract handicaps them when trying to keep other talent.
 
  • Like
  • Cheers
Reactions: PARAM and CGI_Ram
Status
Not open for further replies.