OFFICIAL 2021 Free agency, cuts, trades, and more

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
  • Like
Reactions: RamFan503
Merlin said:
I think we're saying the same thing there Philly. So yeah, I agree. :cheers2:
Click to expand...
Yeah, was really just responding to your last potential assertion, which you also doubted, that they were locked in on Atwell.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: Merlin
Denver feels like the right spot... But hey, who else might get in the mix?

Guesses?

Denver holds some power if there is a lack of serious bidders.
 
OldSchool said:
Very sad! Watched him play a couple of times in college.
Click to expand...

Where in Hawaii? I believe he went to Mater Dei HS.Might have been a lot of partying there ? Don’t know why he went to Hawaii (grades?)
Matt Barkley & Matt Lienert went QB’s there as well.

I’ve seen kids get messed up early in life & struggle after sports.
 
CGI_Ram said:
Denver feels like the right spot... But hey, who else might get in the mix?

Guesses?

Denver holds some power if there is a lack of serious bidders.
Click to expand...

Raiders. I don't think NFC teams are on the table, but if they are maybe Philly or the aints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CGI_Ram
Angry Ram said:
Raiders. I don't think NFC teams are on the table, but if they are maybe Philly or the aints.
Click to expand...
I could see the Skins making a strong move. They have a lot of young talent so they could give a player plus picks. They are a QB away kind of like Tampa was.

And if GB gives up Rogers it will be a case where they will be rebuilding for a couple yrs behind a young QB and after that Rogers may be gone.

So it's not like they are trading a 26 yr old QB that they would have to deal with in the NFC for 10 years. So no reason not to get the most value regardless where it comes from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Petrowsky and CGI_Ram
PhillyRam said:
I could see the Skins making a strong move. They have a lot of young talent so they could give a player plus picks. They are a QB away kind of like Tampa was.

And if GB gives up Rogers it will be a case where they will be rebuilding for a couple yrs behind a young QB and after that Rogers may be gone.

So it's not like they are trading a 26 yr old QB that they would have to deal with in the NFC for 10 years. So no reason not to get the most value regardless where it comes from.
Click to expand...
Agree. If they get a solid QB they can lock down the almighty NFC East. That defense is looking scary good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CGI_Ram
I have no place to post this, so here it is.

Do we have a wise-guy on Rams on Demand? I sure hope so!

On the NFL Talk front page, there is a box on the right-hand-side that lists the Rams' recent nine draft selections. However, ten names are listed.

Listed as pick #69 is LS John Holmes.

I briefly considered this an odd but inadvertent error. Now I am wondering.

John Holmes was a famous thespian many years ago. Well known for his 'impressive' talent. The #69 seems like an interesting choice, so I am thinking this was not a mere error/coincidence. Now the LS designation has me a little puzzled. Long Snapper seems a little heavy-handed.

So, am I correct in my analysis; or do I have issues that only a professional can resolve? These choices are not mutually exclusive.
 
  • 4HaHa
Reactions: BC Ramfan, CGI_Ram, Memento and 1 other person
Allen2McVay said:
I have no place to post this, so here it is.

Do we have a wise-guy on Rams on Demand? I sure hope so!

On the NFL Talk front page, there is a box on the right-hand-side that lists the Rams' recent nine draft selections. However, ten names are listed.

Listed as pick #69 is LS John Holmes.

I briefly considered this an odd but inadvertent error. Now I am wondering.

John Holmes was a famous thespian many years ago. Well known for his 'impressive' talent. The #69 seems like an interesting choice, so I am not thinking this was a mere error/coincidence. Now the LS designation has me a little puzzled. Long Snapper seems a little heavy-handed.

So, am I correct in my analysis; or do I have issues that only a professional can resolve? These choices are not mutually exclusive.
Click to expand...

Memento called this out a couple days ago, although i'm not sure CGI has adequately addressed the issue. Could be Russian hackers or even the same gang that shut down the gas pipeline in the east, but if they're trying to bribe ROD, don't give them a cent. :beer2:
Wouldn't you know that it would be a girl to first alert us to a John Holmes sighting. :gig:
 
  • 3HaHa
Reactions: Mackeyser, CGI_Ram and Memento
Riverumbbq said:
Memento called this out a couple days ago, although i'm not sure CGI has adequately addressed the issue. Could be Russian hackers or even the same gang that shut down the gas pipeline in the east, but if they're trying to bribe ROD, don't give them a cent. :beer2:
Click to expand...
Memento is an astute and wise poster. Also a little damaged and disturbed. One of my personal favorites.

I never considered Russian interference. I was thinking it was X.
 
Last edited:
  • 3HaHa
  • High Five
  • Thread Winner
Reactions: Mackeyser, CGI_Ram, Memento and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back