• To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

One Year Later

Last year on this day, I posted about my granddaughter Penelope having successful open heart surgery and was overwhelmed with all of the well wishes and prayers from the community.
One year, a second open heart surgery, a feeding tube insertion (and subsequent removal), four heart caths and another 4 1/2 months in the hospital later, this is what has become of it all. She's 23 lbs. 3 oz., 31 1/2 inches long, and her pulmonologist recently referred to her as "the healthiest sick baby he has ever seen".
God is good.

FB_IMG_1490641843916-1.jpg

Your Occupation

Ok so not sure if this is the place to be posting, but wanted to go around and see what everyone does. I'm highly creative and enjoy making anything from fake websites, so team uniform designs, to sports graphics. I'm a Digital Designer with a illustrative background (i love drawing and vectoring). I use Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and After Effects for the majority of my projects. I've worked for the NFL Network and other athletes such as Shelvin Mack of the Utah Jazz. If anyone is in the need for a graphics man, I'm the guy. I guess, unless somebody else here is too. I love collaborating with other creatives and I like looooong walks on the beach followed by romantic kissing cut scenes underneath the peer.

http://www.deadstockstudios.com

http://www.behance.net/deadstock

http://www.instagram/deadstock_studios

If this thread is in the wrong spot, my apologies.

  • Poll Poll
Now that the first round is in the books I need fantasy football help

Who should I draft

  • McCaffrey

    Votes: 5 45.5%
  • Fournette

    Votes: 6 54.5%

I have the first overall pick in a dynasty league im in so we basically do a rookie draft every year. I was really hoping Fouranett wouldn't go the the jags because thats who I was planning on taking but now that hes a jag and McCaffery is a Panther who would you guys take with the #1 overall. Its a standard league meaning no PPR whos gonna have the better career? I can't screw this up. your opinions are much appreciated.

Recent history shows Rams can find impact talent at No. 37

http://www.espn.com/blog/los-angele...istory-says-rams-can-find-impact-talent-at-37

Recent history shows Rams can find impact talent at No. 37

The Los Angeles Rams have some favorable history on their side heading into Day 2 of the 2017 draft: They selected the only Hall of Famer to be drafted 37th overall. That would be Norm Van Brocklin, the former T-formation quarterback who came out of Oregon nearly seven decades ago.

Maybe they're due for another.

The Rams sat out Day 1, watching the three best receivers (Corey Davis, Mike Williams and John Ross), and the three best tight ends (O.J. Howard, Evan Engram and David Njoku) come off the board. Eight defensive backs were also selected, including USC's Adoree' Jackson, who grew up near St. Louis and remained an ardent Rams fan. But general manager Les Snead said his targeted player remains on the board and that he had no motivations to trade into the first round because he still sees impact talent for No. 37.

From 2000 to '16, the 37th overall pick produced three players who were invited to at least one Pro Bowl: guard Andre Gurode, defensive back Eric Weddle and tackle Jon Stinchcomb. They combined for 10 Pro Bowl invites and two All-Pro selections. All 17 of those picks have combined to serve 60 seasons as the primary starters for their respective teams, as defined by Pro-Football Reference. Not bad.

Below is a look at how each of the last 10 have fared, linked with the team that selected them ...

2016: DT Chris Jones, Chiefs: A Mississippi State product, Jones turned in a solid rookie season, starting 11 of 16 games while compiling 10 quarterback hits, five tackles for loss, four pass deflections and two sacks. Pro Football Focus graded him 13th among 127 qualified interior defenders.

2015: WR Devin Smith, Jets: A torn ACL caused Smith to miss the final three games of his rookie year and the first 12 of his second season. The speedy receiver and Ohio State product has compiled only 10 catches for 135 yards and a touchdown so far, but he has a chance to earn more targets.

2014: DT Ra'Shede Hageman, Falcons: Hageman came on strong late in the 2016 season and could be developing into one of the NFL's better linemen. In three years, the Minnesota product has compiled four sacks -- two of them over his last three games -- and five disrupted dropbacks while starting 15 games.

2013: RB Giovani Bernard, Bengals: Bernard has spent his first four years as a backup but has been productive as a runner and a receiver, compiling 4,113 yards from scrimmage and 20 touchdowns. He played in 55 of 58 games, then suffered a torn ACL in Week 10. His average yards per carry went from 4.7 in 2015 to 3.7 in 2016, but the Bengals' offensive line struggled.

2012: T Mitchell Schwartz, Browns: Schwartz spent his first four years with the Browns, then signed a five-year, $33 million contract with the Chiefs. Listed at 6-foot-5, 320 pounds, Schwartz has started all 80 of his games at right tackle and has been among the game's best. Pro Football Focus graded him 27th -- tied with Rodger Saffold -- among 78 qualified tackles last year.

2011: DE Jabaal Sheard, Browns: Sheard spent his first four years with the Browns, starting 50 of his 61 games, then signed a two-year, $11 million contract with the Patriots, helping them win the Super Bowl in February. He parlayed that into a three-year, $25.5 million deal with the Colts. Sheard has racked up 36 sacks and 260 tackles in 89 career games.

2010: DB Nate Allen, Eagles: Allen was a fixture in the Eagles' secondary in 2010-14, starting 69 of the team's 80 games and intercepting 10 passes. But Allen tore his MCL with the Raiders in 2015, playing in only five games, and was in a reserve role in 2016. The Dolphins signed him over the offseason and will give him a chance to start again, with T.J. McDonald serving an eight-game suspension.

2009: DB Alphonso Smith, Broncos: This was a mistake. The Broncos sent a future first-round pick to the Seahawks, which turned into Earl Thomas at 14th overall, to take Smith 37th. After only one year, he was traded to the Lions for a tight end named Dan Gronkowski, who spent most of the prior year on the Lions' practice squad. Smith's career was over after four NFL seasons.

2008: LB Curtis Lofton, Falcons: Lofton started 111 of a possible 112 games for the Falcons and Saints in 2008-14. During that time, he recorded 874 tackles, second most in the NFL during a seven-year span. He then started nine games for the Raiders in 2015 but was released during the ensuing offseason and sat out 2016. Lofton played only one season of a three-year, $18 million contract.

2007: Weddle, Chargers: Weddle is the star of this group and still one of the NFL's best safeties. The Utah product is a four-time Pro Bowler who has twice been named first-team All-Pro. Weddle spent his first nine years starring for the Chargers, then signed a four-year, $26 million deal with the Ravens. In 10 years, Weddle has 23 interceptions, 7 1/2 sacks and 936 tackles. Pro Football Focus graded him the NFL's best safety last season. Not bad for a 32-year-old.


Our path is up and forward"

Upbeat positive competent coaching staff and Snead will his diligence we will get at least 2or3 players that will start out impacting the team week one and our fan bàse come back and increase and team players thinking will start to "believe in themselves again" I know you guys feel me on this and its not too early to think this way guys so let know what you think ???? Dam I all giddy and excited !!!

The Chicago Bears and a Mitchell Trubisky mystery

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/19258773/mitchell-trubisky-lack-experience-make-one-great-draft-mysteries-recent-years

The Chicago Bears and a Mitchell Trubisky mystery


If anybody tells you they're sure Mitchell Trubisky will fail to turn into a superstar with the Bears, they're lying. On the other hand, if anybody tells you they're sure Mitchell Trubisky is guaranteed to thrive in Chicago, they're fibbing too. We know precious little about the player the Bears just traded up to grab with the No. 2 pick in the 2017 NFL draft. Of course, this is true of most draft picks -- but it's drastically more so the case for the North Carolina product.

There's a reasonable case to be argued that the Bears made a smart decision in drafting Trubisky and a similarly fair case suggesting they're foolish to do so. By running through the pros and cons of this pick, you can decide whether you think Chicago finally has found its franchise quarterback. In the case of Trubisky, your opinion is probably as good as anybody else's in the NFL.

Pro: Trubisky was excellent during his lone season as a starter at North Carolina
It's hard to imagine an NFL team drafting a quarterback who wasn't very good in college, but teams have fallen in love with prototypical athletes such as Jake Locker and Kyle Boller before and drafted them high in the first round, even if their collegiate level of performance didn't support that level of investment.

While Trubisky spent his time in school operating out of the shotgun in a spread offense, his physical traits are backed up by impressive numbers. Trubisky completed 68 percent of his passes, in part inflated by the spread, but he averaged 8.4 yards per pass while throwing 30 touchdowns against six picks. Account for his relatively low sack totals and his numbers bounce up to 9.1 adjusted yards per attempt, which was third-best in the ACC.

16th in the country in passing S&P+ and had the ninth-best offense in America on passing downs by S&P+. He also didn't have a ton of help on offense, given that he lost arguably his best receiver, Mack Hollins, in midseason to a broken collarbone. By any account, Trubisky played excellent football in 2016.

Con: Trubisky couldn't beat out an undrafted free agent during his sophomore and junior years
The best argument against Trubisky as a top prospect might be Marquise Williams. After redshirting during his freshman season at Carolina in 2013, Trubisky didn't show enough in practice or with his 78 pass attempts as a redshirt freshman in 2014 to wrest the job away from Williams, who produced much better numbers on a 6-7 North Carolina team that really wasn't going anywhere. Trubisky threw four picks on 78 pass attempts, which didn't help matters.

Maybe 2014 was too early. As a sophomore, though, Trubisky still couldn't beat out Williams for the starting job in 2015, with UNC coach Larry Fedora naming Williams the starter before the campaign. Trubisky was great in limited time, throwing six touchdowns against zero picks, but most of that came after Williams was benched during a game against a FCS-level Delaware team that would eventually finish 4-7, with Trubisky throwing for 312 yards and four touchdowns in the second half. Williams had been off to a slow start, and Trubisky had excelled, but Fedora still felt that Williams was the better quarterback and went back to him for the remainder of the year.

It would be one thing if Trubisky was sitting behind a future superstar, but Williams wasn't wildly productive in college, and he also wasn't considered much of a pro prospect. Williams went undrafted last year before spending time on the Green Bay Packers' practice squad. It's also worrisome that the UNC offense was actually better with Williams in 2015 than it was with Trubisky the following year. The 2015, Tar Heels averaged 40.7 points per game and were 17th in the country in Offensive S&P+, while this pas season's unit averaged 32.3 points per contest while finishing 26th in Offensive S&P+. The 2015 team also didn't send a single drafted offensive player to the NFL, so you can't blame any sort of talent drain on the offensive decline.

It would be wrong to say that Williams is a better player than Trubisky because he beat him out in 2014 and 2015, and college coaches misevaluate players, just as pro coaches do. Sometimes, you don't know what you've got with a quarterback until you hand him the reins and get out of the way. If Trubisky was really worth taking with the second overall pick, though, wouldn't he stand out more than he did in college? Shouldn't he have won the starting job before 2016? Shouldn't he have been the best quarterback in the ACC? Those are fair questions.

Con: There's almost no precedent of a player this inexperienced turning into a franchise quarterback.
We know those questions are fair because virtually every future Pro Bowl quarterback wins his college job early in his career and starts for a few years before leaving for the NFL. Most first-round quarterbacks start 30-plus games, and even the ones who leave after a couple of seasons start 20-plus contests before hitting the pros.

Trubisky started 13 games at North Carolina before leaving school. Throw in the 125 passes he threw as Williams' backup and he makes it to 572 pass attempts after high school. It's not even as if we have junior college tape to work from, as was the case with Aaron Rodgers, who only started 22 games at Cal before turning into a Hall of Famer. Trubisky is as close to a one-and-done quarterback as you will find.

The closest comparison for Trubisky in that regard is Mark Sanchez, who wasn't able to beat out John David Booty as a sophomore in 2007 before taking over in 2008 and going 12-1 with impressive numbers. The Jets traded up to grab him with the fifth overall pick and ended up finding that Sanchez was a backup-caliber signal-caller. The other quarterbacks in recent years who haven't made it to 20 starts aren't really great comparisons for Trubisky, as Ryan Tannehill (19 starts) was a converted wide receiver, while Michael Vick (also 19 starts) was something entirely different as a quarterback. Akili Smith (also 19 starts) burned bright during his season as the primary starter at Oregon but quickly flamed out as a pro. There's one other passer I'll get to shortly.

Nick Foles and Josh McCown, two guys who were incredible in 2013. They combined to throw 40 touchdowns against three picks over a 541-pass sample. Over the remainder of their professional careers, Foles and McCown have thrown 95 touchdowns against 92 interceptions and performed like replaceable backup passers. If Foles and McCown were college quarterbacks in 2013 and left after their one breakout season of tape, they would have been top-three picks. We've seen quarterbacks such as Brian Brohm and Matt Leinart fall out of the top three by sticking in school and revealing themselves to be less effective passers on tape. With Trubisky, what we've seen is good, but we haven't seen much.

Pro: It worked out OK with Cam Newton
The flip side of the we-haven't-seen-much argument is that a quarterback who was very good in a small sample might also end up being great the rest of the time. Cam Newton started his NCAA career at Florida, transferred to Blinn College and then moved to Auburn, where he stunningly led the Tigers to an undefeated season and a national championship. Newton then left for the pros after one season as a starting quarterback and just 292 pass attempts in major college football, with 336 additional passes from his time as a juco quarterback.

The football establishment was skeptical of Newton and, as you know now, the experts were wrong. A poll of anonymous general managers and personnel executives conducted by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel's Bob McGinn before the 2011 NFL draft pegged Blaine Gabbert, not Newton, as the best quarterback in the 2011 class. Jake Locker and Ryan Mallett ranked ahead of Andy Daltonand Colin Kaepernick. Thirteen of the 24 voters said Newton would either be an ineffective pro or a bust.

Newton is different than Trubisky; Newton derived far more of his value as a college player from his legs as a runner and, perhaps more importantly, had both off-field concerns and a significant pedigree as a winner, earning national titles with both Blinn and Auburn. It would be wrong to say Trubisky will follow Newton's path, but it's fair to point out how the unknowns and question marks surrounding Newton haven't remotely impacted his pro career.

Con: The Bears gave up a ton, and they are assuming an enormous amount of risk in trading for Trubisky
It's certainly defensible for a team to grab Trubisky at some point in the draft, but the Bears basically valued Trubisky like he was worth the first overall selection and then some. The Bears sent the third, 67th, and 111th picks in this year's draft and a 2018 third-rounder to move up one spot and grab Trubisky. That's 2,747 points of draft capital on the outdated Jimmy Johnson draft chart, which is a little more than the second overall pick. But by the empirically driven chart created by Chase Stuart of Football Perspective, the Bears gave up 47.2 points of draft capital to move up; that's like giving up the first overall pick (34.6 points) and a pick between the 31st (12.7 points) and 32nd (12.5 points) overall selections.

When the Browns were considering Trubisky as the first pick, the argument was being thrown around that the price shouldn't matter and that they should grab Trubisky if they think he is their quarterback of the future, regardless of the cost. I'm not sure that logic holds up to sound reasoning, both for the Browns and the Bears. It's a little bit like being hungry and paying $200 for a hamburger. If a team could be 100 percent sure that Trubisky was a future superstar, of course, they would be right to draft Trubisky first. It's also pretty clear that there's no way the Bears can be sure about Trubisky and that the significant amount of risk surrounding him makes it more likely the Bears will end up regretting their decision.

the league values dominant pass-rushers nearly as highly as it does quarterbacks these days. If the Bears drafted Trubisky and he turns into a star, they'll get a player who is worth roughly $90 million over the first four years of his career for $30 million in guaranteed money. If they drafted Solomon Thomas and he excelled, meanwhile, they would end up getting a player worth closer to $70 million over his first four seasons while paying that same $30 million. Trubisky has a higher ceiling in terms of positional value and scarcity. But can anyone really argue that Thomas doesn't offer more certainty and a higher ceiling?

Pro: Solomon Thomas (or Myles Garrett or anyone else) isn't a lock to be a superstar, either.
I'm not going to argue that, but I do think it's important to keep in mind that everyone is a risk. Thomas projects to be a star, and I have no reason to think he's likely to fail; but we're often overconfident about our abilities to project future success, even for guys who do have significant college experience. I wrote about this in previewing Cleveland's offseason back in February, while arguing that they should pick Garrett, but think about 2014, when the consensus pick was for Houston to take Jadeveon Clowney. Thanks in part to injuries, both Khalil Mack and Aaron Donald have been far more productive. In 2000, Courtney Brown was the easy first overall selection for the Browns, and yet 19 other players from that draft finished their pro careers with more sacks. Mario Williams was the top pick in 2006, but you might have preferred Elvis Dumervil or Tamba Hali with some hindsight. The same concerns would be in play for Thomas, even though he profiles as a versatile lineman in the vein of Michael Bennett or Calais Campbell.

It's easy to make these calls with hindsight, but that's not the point. What's important here is that you can't think of Trubisky as a risk and compare him to one of the defensive prospects at the top of the draft as a sure thing, because none of them are guaranteed successes, either. It's fair to say Trubisky is riskier, of course, but the Bears might very well have been right to use an enormous amount of draft capital on a quarterback.

Neutral: Wait, didn't the Bears just hand Mike Glennon $18.5 million?
I'm not sure whether it's fair to peg the Bears down for their previous decision. Chicago signed Glennon to a three-year, $45-million deal, which really amounts to a one-year, $16-million deal with a $2.5 million buyout next year. I didn't like the move at the time. And it's interesting to see the Bears basically render Glennon's long-term future with the team moot by making the deal.

This, of course, is very reminiscent of what happened with the Eagles last year. Philadelphia re-signed Sam Bradford, added Chase Daniel for upper-level backup money in free agency, and then decided to go all-in for Carson Wentzand dealt multiple first-round picks to the Browns. The trade revealed that they were expecting to move on from Bradford by the end of 2017, and they ended up getting bailed out when the Vikings lost Teddy Bridgewater during training camp and dealt a first-round pick back to Philly to acquire Bradford.

It's possible that the Bears could do the same thing with Glennon, but the Bridgewater trade -- sending a first-round pick for a quarterback less than two weeks before the season begins -- is basically unprecedented in recent memory. The league also valued Bradford far more than it does Glennon, who got a massive per-year deal, despite reports that the Bears weren't really bidding against anybody else. It's unlikely that the Bears will get a similar sort of haul in a trade for Glennon if they try to trade their starter, at least before this season.

On the other hand, Trubisky isn't exactly a finished product. Keeping Glennon does allow the Bears to bring Trubisky along slowly, and if Glennon succeeds, the Bears will have a happy problem that can be fixed by dealing Glennon away after the 2017 season. If Trubisky disappoints, the Bears will regret spending the money they did on Glennon, but it's a sunk cost at this point. Their investment in Glennon shouldn't preclude Chicago from acquiring Trubisky, but it does beg the question of whether the Bears are establishing a habit of desperately speculating on guys who look like quarterbacks in the hopes that they'll turn into one.

So much of Trubisky's value comes from projecting his future based entirely upon his tools -- notably his arm strength and ability to spin the football -- despite the fact that we know teams often overvalue those specific tools and make colossal mistakes in quarterback evaluation. When Bears general manager Ryan Pace was hired, he contrasted himself from previous general manager Phil Emery by suggesting he wasn't a Moneyball-style GM. In taking a quarterback about whom there is less information to go off of than any other similarly valued passer in recent memory, Pace has proven his point. It's too early to say the Bears were right or wrong, but it's already time to wonder when we'll get to see Trubisky answer the question for them.

Browns get an F for selecting Jabrill Peppers No. 25(The Greg Williams factor)

Browns get an F for selecting Jabrill Peppers No. 25


With the No. 25 pick in the 2017 NFL Draft, the Cleveland Browns select safety Jabrill Peppers from Michigan.

CLE.png
Cleveland Browns

Pete Prisco's Grade: F

"I don't like this pick at all. Where does he play?"

Prisco added on our live draft show that this is an "awful, awful, awful, awful, awful, awful pick with a capital A, which is why I give them an F."

Our friends at the Orange and Brown Report have every angle covered for Cleveland's draft. Plus, you can get a free month of insider access when you buy a one month membership today. Just use the promo code BROWNSDRAFT when you sign up to take advantage of this draft special.

Instant analysis
The Browns are going to get some publicity for their first round in this draft, because they added Myles Garrett No. 1, then traded way down and picked up a big name in Peppers. Peppers is a modern NFL player if there ever was one, becoming the first player in the modern combine to work out as both a linebacker and a defensive back. He's a versatile, dangerous playmaker (albeit who only had one interception with Michigan) that can move all over the field as a chess piece.

who are we drafting tomorrow?

I noticed that the draft was heavy in skilled players, even though those guys were far from the best players available. (The new Bears QB has fewer starts than Tannehill, and that's a near disaster situation.) The NFL is no longer focused on BPA. It's a passing league now and the skilled guys are way overvalued.

That could be good for us though as we got a lot of room for good football players, who aren't necessarily skilled guys, on this team.

So who is it going to be? Who are we drafting tomorrow?

I'd venture a guess but I haven't put any effort into it this year. I'm still riding the Goff high from last year. I still believe we got our franchise guy. And I will believe that unless the new coaching staff is run out of town. But I don't see that happening. He's got at least a 3-year long leash.

I saw the first few picks and the 9'ers killed it with the trade down for the Stanford DE. Not happy about it. Not happy at all. He's not as good as A.D. though. That said, we must get our OL together and build a fort around Goff!!!

Rams should do a draft live feed

I don't think any teams have thought of this yet, but basically stack a live feed crew for the first, second, and third days of the draft and broadcast it straight from their website using that state of the art studio they set up. This is the kind of thing I think would help them greatly as they push to become an elite franchise.

I'd split up the broadcast teams to ensure each day of the draft was divided up from a workload perspective. Basically have Dani, Myles, and Demarco chairing each team and pair them with current and former Rams in an informal type deal where they discuss the picks. They could then have "fly by" visits from Rams' brass like Kevin, Les, coaching staff members, etc.

Curious what you guys think of that. I think it would be pretty damn cool.

ESPNLA Mornings Keyshawn, Jorge: Goff can't Play

Here we are one year later from the 2016 Draft and the Verdict is in....

At approximately the 22:00 minute mark
they discuss that they have seen enough and Jared Goff can't play.

(he's a bust/wasted pick from their eyeball test)

They say (Air Raid system trumps all) regardless of coaching staff etc..

Listen to their dabate (link)
http://www.espn.com/espnradio/losangeles/play?id=19255493



After 7 games these guys fall in the category of an

6a01156e439be2970c01bb094828a1970d-300wi

'My Guys' Draft Day Mock

2.5 - Trade Down 2.5 and 6.22 for 2.27 + 3.27 + 4.26
Its really hard to project trades. I think its a good idea to move back and stock pile picks to build the depth of the roster back up.
2.27 - Gerald Everett TE South Alabama
Everett is dynamic athlete and really impressive for a TE with the ball in his hands. I love how aggressive he plays and the way he boxes out defenders and snatches the ball out of the air. He's a willing blocker and will be good enough as an H-Back to stay on the field. He's very close to Engram for me as a prospect, but way better value with the extra picks.
Login to view embedded media View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRuz7YVGBu8

3.5 - Carlos Henderson WR La Tech
Henderson is my favourite player this year so I have to include him. He's an explosive playmaker with the ball in his hands and can score from anywhere on the field. His ability to catch the football and quickly transition into the runner is elite (Sammy Watkins-esque) and his open field vision is exceptional. He needs work on his route running (keeping his pads low to sell the vertical routes and sinking his hips more) but I am all in with him and believe he can be the best WR of this draft class. His play speed and strength, ability to make tough catches, catch in traffic, separate, and create YAC are all check marks for me. This year I would use him as a vertical slot receiver like how Jamison Crowder was used, or how he was used in 2015.
Login to view embedded media View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wRZDgRFY2I

3.27 - Vince Biegel OLB Wisconsin
Biegel is a spark plug linebacker who has a relentless motor. I really enjoy watching him and think he can turn into a really good SLB in Wade's defense. Apparently Wade thinks so too because the only rumours I hear about the Rams are how much they like Biegel.
4.5 - Will Holden T Vanderbilt
Holden is one of the best run blocking OTs in this draft class. He has issues in pass pro against speed rushers and will need to play on the right side, or maybe move inside. I was impressed watching him. He is one of those types of tackles that the Packers will take in the middle rounds and turn into starter.
4.26 - Chase Roullier C Wyoming
He played on a pro style offense and was asked to do a lot of the things that Kromer wants from his center. His movement skills are very good despite his low sparq score. He plays strong and I think he can turn into a starting center. I don't think I have to convince this board about Roullier. ;)
4.35 - Jeremy Cutrer CB MTSU
Long press corner with good ball skills. He has very good field vision and route awareness. I worry about his weight because he played at around 6'1 165 pounds. He seemed to get pushed around and needs to play at a decent weight (at least 185) to not get bullied by NFL WRs.
5.5 - Ejuan Price OLB Pittsburgh
Ejuan will drop because of his size but he is so disruptive. He is always in the backfield. He might not be a starter in his career but he will be a very good situational pass rusher. Its important to get someone who can rush the passer considering Quinn misses a lot of time.
6.5 - DeAngelo Yancey WR Purdue
Yancey is a big bodied WR with very good movement skills. He uses his body effectively to shield defenders and can run after the catch. He is a very natural deep threat. He has issues with drops and losing focus of the football. He also tries to one hand catch way too often considering it never works. He can be the backup X and hopefully grow into more.
7.16 - Xavier Coleman CB Portland State
He had heart surgery in high school and barely played football, only receiving one offer to play in college. He made the most of it and played very well. He is a press cover CB with very good athleticism. I thought he did an impressive job covering John Ross.

UDFA
Marcus Sayles CB West Georgia
Pat Ricard DE Maine
Mason Schreck TE Buffalo
Jylan Ware OT Alabama State
Eli Ankou DT UCLA
Jordan Simmons T/G USC
Cody Heiman LB Washburn
Devante Mays RB Utah State



Whitworth - Saffold - Roullier - Havenstein - Holden

Goff - Mannion - Murray

Gurley - Brown - Dunbar

Higbee - Everett - Harkey / Hemingway / Schreck

Woods Henderson Austin
Yancey Spruce/Cooper Thomas


DE DE DT
Walker — Donald — Brockers
Westbrooks - Easley - Ankou

SOLB MLB MLB WOLB
Barwin - Ogletree - Barron - Quinn
Biegel - Littleton - Forrest - Price

T Johnson— Cutrer — Robey-Coleman — Webster
Joyner — Alexander

Saints wanted Tru

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/19255164

Will a corner be moved?
While many have been waiting to see if and where Seattle's Richard Sherman is traded, another cornerback already turned down the chance to move teams.

Earlier this month, the New Orleans Saints were willing to trade what was thought to be a second-round pick to theLos Angeles Rams for their franchise cornerback, Trumaine Johnson, who already has signed his franchise tender. Only issue was, Johnson was unwilling to agree to a long-term deal in New Orleans because he so badly wanted to remain in Los Angeles, and the Rams have said they aren't particularly interested in dealing.

Now it will be interesting to see if there's a team on draft weekend that is willing to trade for Johnson without him agreeing to a long-term deal, and simply playing this season on the franchise tender. It would not be ideal for the team trading for him, but if it was confident enough in its ability to re-sign him, maybe a team would decide it would rather have Johnson than an unproven rookie cornerback, as good as this rookie cornerback class is.

Do I expect it? Not at all. But it's at least a situation to watch.

Trading Down

A few scenerios to consider using the trade value chart (which may or may not still mean anything)

Bengals get pick 37, pick 234
Rams get pick 41, pick 153, pick 193

Browns get pick 37, 112
Rams get picks 52, 65

Bucs get 37, 153
Rams get 50, 84

Raiders get 37
Rams get 56, 88, 129

Of course, it all depends on how picks 1-36 go - and it takes 2 to tango - these teams would need to have someone there at 37 that they like to make these kind of swaps - but these are fairly close to even value.

My Personal Wish / Hope list for the Rams Draft!

I am wishing and Hoping the Rams can come out of the 2017 with Players "Like" the Following at these Positions:

At WR someone Like:

Brucetouchdown.jpg

B_R_U_U_U_C_E!!

At TE someone Like:
Conwell2.jpg

Ernie Conwell would fill the Bill!

At Center someone Like:

Iman3.jpg

Ken Iman! (#50) When was the last time you saw a Center Protect a QB Like he was a OT!!


At OG someone like:
Tom Mack2a.jpg

Tom Mack! I like Old School Types!!

At OLB someone CRAZY like:
Kevin Greene.jpg

Kevin Greene " Loved those Blond Locks and he was a Mad-Man!!


At FS someone Vicious & Nasty w/ Great hands Like:
Night-Train4.jpg

Night Train Lane "Loved his 'Neck-Tie's' too"


And a decent SS, someone like;
Perry4.jpg

Rod Perry!

And My Final Hope is we can Pick Up a Good Pass Rusher, someone Like, My Personal Friend;
deacon_jones_1969_09_13.jpg

The Great David 'Deacon' Jones!!!
DJ-Gif-Breathing.gif

" How would you like to see someone Like Him Breathing down the Necks of Opposing QB's for the Rams again!!?!

Welcome to Draft Day

http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2017/04/27/nfl-mock-draft-gareon-conley-albert-breer

Welcome to Draft Day
It’s here, it’s now and it’s unpredictable. How far will Gareon Conley fall? When will the QBs be picked? Which team holds the most power? Here’s an attempt to answer those questions
by Albert Breer

mmqb-gareon-conley.jpg

Gareon Conley was a two-year starter at Ohio State and is widely considered to be one of the top cornerbacks available in the 2017 draft
Photo: Randy Litzinger/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images


How far will Gareon Conley fall?

NFL teams that had strong interest in the Ohio State corner before the April 9 rape accusation against him were scrambling to figure that out Wednesday. And simultaneously, they were furiously trying to gather any information they could on what happened that night at the Cleveland Westin. And Conley was on the phone to coaches and general managers giving his side of the story.

Now, the problem: This probably won’t be settled by Thursday at 8 p.m. Eastern.

If Conley’s guilty, then he deserves the fate that’s likely awaiting him. But there are questions that need to be answered about what happened in that room, whether it was consensual, and what the woman’s motive was after Conley kicked her out, which is the one event in the timeline that matches up in the stories of both the accuser and the accused.

I asked one NFC personnel chief, who likes Conley as a player, about where he stood. Answer: “Confused.” An assistant coach for an AFC team said, “I don’t know enough yet, I just don’t know enough. Could it be a setup? I don’t know.” An AFC executive was more definitive: “He’s going to drop. It could be BS, but uncertainty prevails, and I don’t think he’s cleared by Thursday.”

In this week’s Game Plan, we’ll get to which teams control this year’s draft, and break down how four very interesting positions could fall over the next few days. And we’ll get to more of the draft rumors and buzz.

We start with the story of the day, which is the big story in the same way Laremy Tunsil became the big story on the fly last year and La’el Collins became the big story two years ago. In each of those cases, news broke too close to the draft for the players to respond. Tunsil was expected to go in the top 5 or 6 picks and fell to 13th. Collins was a borderline first-rounder and went undrafted.

Before the rape accusation, scuttlebutt in league circles had Conley connected to the Saints at 11, the Eagles at 14 and the Colts at 15. After talking to teams now, it seems likely Conley’s drop will be more precipitous than Tunsil’s, but he probably won’t fall out of the draft like Collins.

Some facts on Conley …

• NFL teams viewed him as one of the cleaner prospects among potential first-rounders from a character standpoint. That doesn’t mean he isn’t guilty. But if he had a thick file of previous incidents, a lot of clubs would probably say, “forget this” and just move on.

Teams that were lukewarm on him to begin with, or don’t have a big corner need, probably will treat this that way. Teams with a genuine interest will do their homework the best they can in the time available. One such club said that in five days of combine interviews, Conley was the most impressive player they talked to, and displayed off-the-charts football IQ.

• Ohio State coaches, at least the ones I’ve talked to at (full disclosure) my alma mater, were stunned to hear the news. Suffice it to say, Conley was among the last of their players they expected to be accused of a crime this serious.

One assistant said, “I don’t know what happened, but I’d stand on the table for the kid.” Again, doesn’t mean Conley is innocent. But teams have been calling Columbus, and that kind of feedback is part of the picture.

• The strength of the position in this year’s class will hurt Conley, as it figures to hurt Washington’s Sidney Jones, who suffered a torn Achilles at his pro day. I wrote last week that one team had 35 corners with draftable grades (more on that later), and there’s a feeling that potential rookie-year starters in the secondary will be available into the fourth and fifth rounds. So it’s easy for teams to look at Conley, decide that—no matter the truth—it isn’t worth the risk and move on to another player with a similar grade.

So where are teams now? Conley has reached out to as many head coaches and GMs as he could over the past 36 hours to give them his side of the story. Teams have been talking with other witnesses (one is a childhood friend of Conley’s, another didn’t know him before April 9) in the case too, and going back to re-vet Conley’s character.

Of course, there have been plenty of cases in which a player with a pristine reputation was guilty of a heinous crime. No one saw Ray Rice coming. No one saw Darren Sharper coming. So while it’s relevant that no one seems to have seen this coming with Conley, it’s not in any way definitive of anything.

That uncertainty is going to cost Conley a lot of money.

There’s a chance he falls out of the draft all together, but teams I’ve talked to figured he could land in the third or fourth round now if teams feel comfortable he’ll be cleared. At that point, the upside is you get a potential high-end starter at premium position for a bargain basement price. And if he’s guilty of what he’s been accused of, you can cut him without much penalty. The reality is he’s the one paying a price here.

Let’s say he’s the first pick in the fourth round. Last year that was Cleveland’s Joe Schobert, who signed a four-year, $2.974 million deal with $633,956 guaranteed. Without the accusation, I’d have mocked Conley to Philly at 14. Last year’s 14th pick, Oakland’s Karl Joseph, did a four-year, $11.884 million deal, and all of it was guaranteed.

One AFC head coach said Wednesday morning, “No matter what happened, there’s going to be a lesson for all these kids going forward.”

If Conley’s guilty, it a lesson (hopefully) few have to be taught. If he’s not—based on what Collins and Tunsil went through, and Conley probably will—it’s one that more guys need to learn.

The Draft Power Brokers

mmqb-mariota.jpg

With Marcus Mariota under center and two first-round picks, the Titans are in enviable position
Photo: Wesley Hitt/Getty Images


OK, so in the past, I’ve written on the power brokers in each year’s draft. And it’s not only about who has the most capital—anyone can count up picks—but also who will have the flexibility to move and strike.

As much as anything else, that can be defined as a team that can do things that others can’t. Which is why, even though they have three picks fewer than the Browns and Bengals, I’m going with the Titans this year.

Here’s the deal: Because of the depth of this class at several spots, this year’s draft is one in which teams that want to trade down will have trouble finding suitors. And yet, I think the Titans are in a position to deal down, and more than once.

With the fifth pick, Tennessee sits right in the vicinity of where the first quarterback could go. At 18, the Titans are just ahead of an expected run on offensive linemen—there are four (Alabama’s Cam Robinson, Utah’s Garrett Bolles, Wisconsin’s Ryan Ramcyzk and Western Kentucky’s Forrest Lamp) who seem to have separated from the pack—in a year where the demand greatly outdistances the supply.

So if you want in on the top quarterbacks, you’ll call Titans GM Jon Robinson. And if you’re a playoff team in need of offensive line help, ditto.

“Those will probably manifest themselves closer to when the draft starts, depending on what players are available when our pick gets close,” Robinson said from his office on Tuesday afternoon. “I’d like to think, based on our movement last year, teams would be willing to call and see if we’d be willing to slide around a little.”

And all of this will close the loop on the Jared Goff trade between the Titans and the Rams.

So far, the Titans have flipped that one pick—the 2016 first overall pick, which they deal to the Rams in mid-April last year—into starting right tackle Jack Conklin, bulldozing former Heisman winner Derrick Henry, and reserve (for now) nose tackle Austin Johnson. Tennessee has two picks left from that deal—fifth overall tonight, and 100th overall Friday.

“The players we took last year with that trade, that certainly paid dividends for us,” Robinson said. “And I certainly hope the players we can acquire with those picks in this year’s draft can pay dividends. So it’s the culmination of both draft classes. … We’re certainly excited about the opportunity to add guys, and glad we have all these picks this year.”

What’ll make it easier to hit now is the job that Robinson and coach Mike Mularkey have done creating an identity for the roster and patching holes. It’s not as if they don’t have needs—receiver is one, and corner is another. It’s just that those needs are not glaring to the point where the Titans wouldn’t be able to, say, sit and take someone at another position, like an O.J. Howard, fifth overall.

So coming off a nine-win season, playing in a winnable division, and with a franchise QB in tow, Robinson seems poised to set up his team’s next step, with plenty of reason to be happy with where the Titans stand.

“We set out wanting to add tough, dependable guys, guys that could play that style of football,” Robinson said. “That’s been my background, certainly has been Mike’s background. So to find those guys, and get those players to buy in, both in free agency last year and then in the draft and in this most recent free agency period, it’s been good.”

And with a real chance to get better. And with that, here are six other teams in position to be power brokers over the next three days:

CLEVELAND BROWNS

Total picks: 11
Picks in the Top 50: 3
Picks in the Top 100: 5

The Browns know the score—having all this capital is great, but they have to start turning it into players. Coach Hue Jackson told me back at the combine, “Where we go, where we’re headed, this offseason is such a huge piece.” The week after that exchange they splurged on the offensive line. This week they could add a generational defensive talent and a quarterback, and still have a bushel of picks to spend.

CAROLINA PANTHERS

Total picks: 8
Picks in the Top 50: 2
Picks in the Top 100: 4

The Panthers have a pick in every round, and their eight total are spaced nicely, with the Josh Norman compensatory pick bolstering the haul. They also sit in a spot in the Top 10, at No. 8, where teams could look to come up for a quarterback. And the depth at tight end and running back—two positions rival teams suspect the Panthers will consider filling if they stick at 8—gives Dave Gettleman and company flexibility.

CINCINNATI BENGALS

Total picks: 11
Picks in the Top 50: 2
Picks in the Top 100: 3

The Bengals have made the list on raw volume, and benefit from the rule change allowing trades of comp picks—they have four of those. The fact that they have 11 gives them the freedom to potentially wait on needs to take an O.J. Howard or John Ross at 9. And also take a risk, as is their tendency, with a guy like Joe Mixon at the top of Round 2. Worth noting: They’ve got four picks between 138 and 193.

NEW ORLEANS SAINTS

Total picks: 7
Picks in the Top 50: 3
Picks in the Top 100: 4

With three picks inside the first round-and-a-half (11, 32, 42), New Orleans can take one last stab at trading for Malcolm Butler. Or they could move around. The 32nd pick could be a valuable chip to deal to a team looking to come up for a quarterback, given the fifth-year option on first-round deals and the expense of the position. And the Saints have two more picks in the third round, which will make them a Friday power broker.

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS

Total picks: 10
Picks in the Top 50: 2
Picks in the Top 100: 3

Getting value for the second pick will be tough, but with GM John Lynch and coach Kyle Shanahan carrying six-year contracts and a roster with a ton of problems, there’s a real chance for the Niners to maintain a top-guy-on-the-board approach throughout and take advantage of the strengths of the class. And they do have a cluster of six picks between 143 and 219 that should facilitate movement.

SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

Total picks: 7
Picks in the Top 50: 1
Picks in the Top 100: 3

The Seahawks’ setup is interesting Friday night, with three picks clustered between 90 and 106, and at least the perception that you’ll be able to get good cornerbacks, safeties, receivers, tight ends and running backs at this juncture. So Seattle could just sit and take advantage of the draft’s depth at the end of Round 3, or they could move one or more of those picks to go up or down.

Others to watch: Broncos (10 picks, 1 in Top 50, 3 in Top 100); Chiefs (10 picks, 1 in Top 50, 3 in the Top 100); Redskins (10 picks, 2 in the top 50, 3 in the Top 100).

FIRST AND 10

mmqb-nate-peterman.jpg

Looking for a quarterback sleeper in the draft? Pitt’s Nate Peterman might fit the bill
Photo: Streeter Lecka/Getty Images


1. I’ve talked to two teams that have Pitt’s Nate Peterman among their top five quarterbacks. And some compare him to Kirk Cousins. Interesting Day 2 guy.

2. Speaking of quarterbacks, important to remember what might be available in 2018: Cousins, Jimmy Garoppolo, USC’s Sam Darnold, UCLA’s Josh Rosen and Wyoming’s Josh Allen. That’s part of the equation tonight.

3. I’m interested to see Adrian Peterson’s fit in a Saints offense that’s always put a value on versatility. Can he reinvent himself? Will he look the same in such a multiple scheme? Should be interesting to watch.

4. Marshawn Lynch’s fit in Oakland is more natural. He’ll complement the Raiders’ stable of Taiwan Jones, DeAndre Washington and Jalen Richard, all of whom lack the size and power Lynch brings.

5. I think the issue for the Saints in pursuing Malcolm Butler isn’t the idea of trading away any one pick. It’s the idea of parting with multiple picks. New Orleans only has seven total, and the defense needs help in a bunch of areas.

6. While we’re there, at least notable that the Patriots brought likely first-round OTs Ryan Ramczyk and Garrett Bolles to Foxborough, when they don’t pick until 72nd overall. Tells you they’re at least prepared for a trade.

7. If the Vikings don’t exercise Teddy Bridgewater’s option for 2018, then both he and Sam Bradford will be in contract years. Not ideal for a team that used the Bradford trade last year as a beacon that it was in a championship window.

8. Cowboys tight end Jason Witten this week left his future open-ended—he’s now under contract until 2021—and that underscores his amazing career. Try to find another tight end as durable and dependable through 14 years.

9. The Cardinals getting back Daryl Washington could, conceivably, fill a pretty significant hole for the team at linebacker. He’s 30 now, and hasn’t played in four years, but was a heck of a player before substance issues derailed him.

10. All the best to everyone affected by the ESPN layoffs. And especially to Jean-Jacques Taylor and Calvin Watkins, two guys who this punk kid learned a ton from in his short time in Dallas.

FOUR-DOWN TERRITORY

mmqb-deshaunwatson2.jpg

Already a two-time Heisman finalist and a national champion, Deshaun Watson has a legit chance to add Top 5 draft pick to his recent accomplishments
Photo: Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images


1. Where and when will the QBs go? OK, so this is what everyone wants to know, and this is probably the hardest position to predict. Some questions have to be answered. First, will the Jaguars take Deshaun Watson? The closer we get to draft day, the stronger the whispers have become that Tom Coughlin loves Watson, and that he really could take him over Leonard Fournette, which would mean the end of Blake Bortles is near.

Second, will the Browns land Mitch Trubisky? EVP Sashi Brown knows where he’s going, but my bet is the compromise will be taking Myles Garrett first and being aggressive with 12 to go get Trubisky.

Third, will the Chargers take a quarterback at 7? Will the Bills take one at 10? The former has been coy about its QB interest; the latter has been outward.

Fourth, does Arizona pull the trigger on Patrick Mahomes at 13? Word is, Bruce Arians gave him high marks, but the call here is GM Steve Keim’s, and Arians may be retired in a year or two.

And then later, you have Houston, who, I’m told, was impressed with Watson; and the teams with older QBs (Chiefs, Giants, Steelers) that could be suitors for either Mahomes or Davis Webb, both considered raw prospects who would benefit from a situation in which their team is under no pressure to play them.

There’s a scenario where three QBs in the first 15 picks. There’s another where one or two go that high, and then there’s a run at the end of the first round. Should be entertaining to watch.

2. The Reuben Foster dilemma. In a vacuum, each of Alabama linebacker Reuben Foster’s problems are workable. The issue now is that his file has gotten thick. According to sources with four teams, there is some drug background from early in Foster’s time in Tuscaloosa.

But because it was just marijuana, and because his football character has been beyond reproach, it wasn’t seen as an issue. Then he failed his combine drug test, which means he’ll be in the drug program, and raised another set of questions about his discipline.

So fair or not, Foster is dealing with that. And his medical (shoulder, knee) has been troublesome to some teams. The flip side? He’s overcome a lot to get where he is—one evaluator called it a “miracle” he’s made it this far—and he showed growth both as a player and a person in his time in college.

“I’ll be surprised if he falls too far,” said an AFC personnel executive. “He’s talented enough to play on every down—he can play the run, play the pass. You have to have a plan, give him structure and direction, and follow his maturation and development on and off the field. But he’s got a chance to be a special player.”

Before the medical issues and drug test result came to light, I’d have said Foster was a contender to go as high as second overall to San Francisco. Now, I think he goes in the teens. And that fall has opened the door for one of the draft’s very best stories—Temple LB Haason Reddick—to go on the fringes of the Top 10.

3. Corners galore. Maybe the draft’s most interesting position, outside of quarterback, is at corner. We mentioned that one team considers more than 30 cornerbacks draftable this year, which is an enormous number. Ohio State’s Marshon Lattimore is likely to be the first one taken. Who comes next is anyone’s guess. Ask five people and you might get five different answers.

And while there are two safeties who have separated from the pack—LSU’s Jamal Adams and Ohio State’s Malik Hooker—there’s depth there too that could lead to two more players (maybe Washington’s Budda Baker and Utah’s Marcus Williams) slipping into the bottom of the first round. And if teams want to wait at either spot, they can.

“I’d say going into this draft, there’s more middle-round guys that can play,” said one AFC defensive backs coach. “Last year after the second round there just wasn’t much. This year we’re gonna say, ‘This guy went in the fifth round and he’s starting.’ It legitimately goes at corner this year into the fourth and fifth round.

And at safety, it’s solid into the third or fourth round. Take [Rayshawn] Jenkins, from Miami. He loses 10 pounds, and you get him in the fourth round, and you may have something. All the way, you’ve got some good players that have certain traits that generally don’t get that deep into draft.”

One reason this particular coach gave for that was the slowing of a trend that had seen college coaches put all their multidimensional athletes on offense. An example: Both Lattimore and Hooker arrived at Ohio State without a firm position and landed on defense.

4. The return of the tight end. An interesting fact I found the other day: It’s been 11 years since multiple tight ends went in the first round of the draft. It’s good bet that the drought ends on Thursday. My sense is that Howard is a near lock to go in the top 10, maybe as high as fifth overall, and Miami’s freakish-but-raw David Njoku comes off the board somewhere in the 20s, maybe to Detroit at 21 or the Giants at 23.

And beyond just those two, there is depth. Adam Shaheen, from Division II Ashland (Ohio) University, is a 280-pound monster. Evan Engram from Ole Miss and Clemson’s Jordan Leggett are versatile H-back types. Michigan’s Jake Butt, recovering from a torn ACL, is a strong traditional-style prospect who has the look of someone who’ll play in the NFL for a long time.

Virginia Tech’s Bucky Hodges has potential. And all of this is a welcome development for GMs and coaches after a six-year run during which only two tight ends (Detroit’s Eric Ebron and Cincinnati’s Tyler Eifert) went in the first round, and teams have been scouring even the college basketball ranks to find prospects at the position.

Why the dry spell? Well, we had West Virginia coach Dana Holgerson on our SI.com set Wednesday to tape for our draft show (tune in Thursday night!) and he bemoaned people complaining that he hasn’t used the tight end in his offense, adding “They aren’t easy to find.” And when you think about the combination of height, weight, speed, strength, toughness and ball skills it takes to play the position and play it well, that makes sense.

* * *

I make tons of calls this time of year—and I love the interaction with all the coaches and personnel folks (s/o to all you guys for the help) over these weeks. I hear lots of things, and by the time the draft arrives, my brain is mush.

But this year there was one thing someone said to me that’s pretty much marked everything I’ve done since.

“I feel bad for you guys having to predict all of it this year. Even we don’t know.”

So here’s your lesson going into Thursday night: Mock drafts are never that accurate at baseline, because the draft is hard to project, and this year might be the hardest one to forecast I can remember.

The problem is the positions that are strong are also deep. That goes for corner. It goes for safety. It goes for running back and tight end. It goes for the pass rushers. So while Myles Garrett is the consensus top player, there are a lot of different opinions on who’s second, third and fourth, and there’s widespread disagreement on the order players at each position come off the board.

Issued players

The Rams this offseason have brought in a certain type of player to change their culture: leaders, captains, etc. But do you think they are okay with taking risks on players with personality issues?

Caleb Brantley
Ishmael Zamora
Gereon Conley
Dalvin Cook
Joe Mixon
Chad Kelly

All of these guys have draft day slide written all over them for their off the field issues. What round are the Rams comfortable taking this type player? Is the new culture not going to allow these kind of selections?

Final OldSchool 2017 mock

Not changing much from the last one really and not going to pretty it up much.

Round 2 pick 5:

Chris Godwin WR Penn St.


Don't think Engram will be there like most people want and for me Godwin is the best WR to take in round 2. I could be happy with alternate picks of Zay Jones or Kupp

Round 3 pick 5:

Akhello Witherspoon CB Colorado


For me one of the best 3 or 4 CB we could take in this draft regardless of round. Steps in and pushes EJ Gaines outside from day one opposite of TruJo

Round 4 pick 5:

George Kittle TE Iowa


Not changing much, I've been sold on this guy and this is a good spot to take him IMO. Pairs up nicely with Higbee.

Round 4 pick 35:

Chase Roullier C Wyoming


Been on him since day 1 and will go down on this ship.

Round 5 pick 5:

Damontee Kazee CB San Diego St


This is where our 2nd db comes in, could be a depth safety as well. Kazee is another that I was sold on lets keep the ball rolling. Holsey, Wilson and White are other CB options here.

Round 6 pick 5:

Keionta Davis DE Tenn-Chattannooga


Somebody I did a little study on for our ROD mock with the Bengals picks. Like this kid and he could be a good developmental DE.

Round 6 pick 22:

Chad Williams WR Grambling


I went with Davis in my last mock but I'm changing it to somebody we've reportedly met with multiple times. This guy has some blazing speed, which Snead and McVay have hinted is a direction we're going. Also mixes in good size and strength, did 22 reps on the press as a WR!

Round 7 pick 16:

Storm Norton OT Toledo


A change from my past mocks for him I'll just quote his NFL.com profile for info on him. He's got size but has work to do with Coach Kromer.

STRENGTHS
Tall tackle with extremely long legs and arms are well above average for the position at over 35 inches long. Adequate foot quickness in his pass slides. Blocks with good arm extension and utilizes length as a recovery tool when beaten. Better lateral movement than expected. Able to pull and lead block in power. Combo blocks feature strong secure and fluid climb to second level target. Needs more knee bend, but lands at a high rate in space. Mirrors in pass sets with good balance and good posture.
WEAKNESSES
Plays from a two-point stance in Toledo offense. Will have to learn to play from three-point stance and fire out of his stance with better bend. Steps are slow and stiff into his first contact. Hands are strong but placement is too wide. Opponents will land first and jolt him due to natural leverage deficiency because of his height. High-cut frame creates anchor imbalance. Below average redirect against inside counters.
DRAFT PROJECTION
Round 7-PFA
NFL COMPARISON
Pace Murphy


Adding 2 WR one who could step in right away and contribute the other is a speed guy with some work to do. Add a complimentary TE as well as our Center of the future and a OT to develop. Defense added IMO two very good CB one to play right away and the other will be a ST force and work in his snaps. Also added youth and depth in a DT. We can resign Alexander and Joyner and this gives us a very good and young secondary going forward for Wades defense. Norton could take over next year for GRob and Roullier might take over this year for Sullivan. Anyways see you guys in chat tomorrow for Round 1!

Filter