• To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Los Angeles Rams vs Dallas Cowboys 1975 and 1979

I have seen some old Ram games on youtube before,but I haven't
seen much of the old pregame shows.
Seeing Phyllis George brings back memories.
And Jayne "My God Your'e Fine" Kennedy. Geez.
Seeing Jayne at the impressionable age of 8,undoubtedly had something
to do with me being an equal opportunity pimp,during my tail chasing years.lol


Login to view embedded media View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEbIOwt_BEM



Login to view embedded media View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-gosWyPiqY

Rams' Mark Barron: No practice yet this week

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/1632196/mark-barron

by RotoWire Staff | RotoWire

Barron (thumb) didn't practice Thursday, Rich Hammond of the Los Angeles Daily News reports.

Barron has made up for a one-tackle showing against the Colts in the season opener, totaling 48 tackles (42 solo), one sack and one interception over the last five games. With a thumb injury keeping him out of practice the past two days, there is some murkiness about his odds to suit up Sunday against the Cardinals in London. As such, his status should be watched closely to ensure his IDP viability for Week 7.


Rams Week 7 injury report: Mark Barron, Cody Davis out Wednesday
http://theramswire.usatoday.com/201...-week-7-injury-report-mark-barron-cody-davis/

Mark Barron was on the injury report all last week with a knee injury, and he popped up on Wednesday’s list with a new ailment. He has a thumb injury that kept him out of the Rams’ first day of practice.

In addition to Barron being a non-participant, Cody Davis was also held out with a thigh injury. Connor Barwin, John Sullivan and Andrew Whitworth were given their usual veteran rest days, as well.

The Rams are still in Jacksonville and held Wednesday’s practice at the University of North Florida. They leave for London on Thursday, shortening the amount of time spent across the pond.

As for the Cardinals, they’re also relatively healthy with only two players missing practice: Olsen Pierre and Xavier Williams. Patrick Peterson practiced on a limited basis with a quad injury, as well.

http://www.therams.com/team/injury-report.html

Ranking the NFL's best, worst offensive lines

I didn't see this one posted anywhere. Apologies if someone already did.
  • KC JoynerESPN Insider
http://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/sto...ffensive-lines-football-which-trends-continue

The impact that blocking has on offensive performance cannot be overstated. Over a decade of research I've done in measuring run blocking indicates that ball carriers are four to five times more productive on plays with good run blocking versus plays with bad run blocking. The passing game also displays a huge disparity, as quarterbacks are roughly three times as productive on a yards-per-dropback basis with a clean pass pocket as they are on dropbacks when pass-rush pressure is impacting the pocket.

Since we're now at roughly the one-third mark of the 2017 NFL season, it's a good time to take a look at how every NFL team's blocking wall (a term that includes anyone who blocks on a play) grades out at this time.

The details of the grading system can be found here, with the nutshell explanation being that it uses a wide variety of advanced blocking metrics to come up with an A-F grade for every platoon.

Now that we have the preliminaries out of the way, let's take a look at the top five and bottom five blocking walls, predict if those blocking paces will continue, and review some interesting metrics being posted by a couple of AFC playoff contenders.


Top five offensive blocking walls
i

1. Los Angeles Rams
Grade: A

Head coach Sean McVay deserves a lot of credit for his highly creative playcalling, but a big part of why those plays are succeeding is the elite performance of the Rams' blockers. They rank tied for first in my good blocking rate (GBR) metric that measures run-blocking consistency, as they are giving their ball carriers quality run blocking on 50.4 percent of planned rushing plays. This group is nearly as adept in pass blocking, as the 2.5 seconds average time in pocket (TIP) they are giving Jared Goff on pass plays is a league-leading rate.

Outlook: The Rams have placed first or second in GBR every week this season, but that could change given that three of their next four matchups (Arizona, Houston and Minnesota) all have front sevens that have a B or higher grade in my front-seven grading system.

Gurley not a fan of international games: 'They need to stop this'

https://www.thescore.com/news/1402243

Gurley not a fan of international games: 'They need to stop this'

Todd Gurley seems to be a man of routine.

The Los Angeles Rams running back wasn't too pleased when he was asked how this week's game against the Arizona Cardinals in London impacted his schedule.

"Terrible," Gurley said, according to Alden Gonzalez of ESPN. "They need to stop this, all this stuff. This London, this Mexico City stuff, it needs to stop."

Los Angeles stayed in Florida after defeating the Jacksonville Jaguars last Sunday, before heading to London on Thursday.

The Rams also played in London last year and are expected to head across the pond again in 2018 and 2019. Gurley wanted to make it clear that his issue is with the schedule disruption, not the fans.

"It's cool playing over there, don't get me wrong," Gurley said. "Just more of the long week, messes up a bunch of people's schedules. I'm pretty sure y'all (the media) wanna be in y'all bed right now, too. But naw, it's all good. It'll be love. The fans over there are great

Rams off to London after wrapping up Jacksonville road show/Vinny B

Rams off to London after wrapping up Jacksonville road show

rams_raiders_football_24356735.jpg

Rams coach Sean McVay and his team left Jacksonville Thursday for London, where they will play the Arizona Cardinals on Sunday. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

y VINCENT BONSIGNORE | vbonsignore@scng.com | Daily News
October 19, 2017 at 4:11 pm

JACKSONVILLE — As a horn blasted into the early afternoon, Sean McVay called the Rams into a circle at the middle of a soccer field at the University of North Florida, said a few words and then dismissed them from practice.

And with that, the Rams six-day business trip to Jacksonville had come to an end. Awaiting them were four large buses that would eventually deliver them to the nearby Jacksonville airport for their 9-hour flight to London, where they will host the Arizona Cardinals on Sunday before scattering for their bye week.

The week in North Florida had been good to them, beginning with a 27-17 win over the Jacksonville Jaguars that pushed them to 4-2 for the first time in 11 years and put them in position to make a serious division run. Ahead are winnable games against the Cardinals and New York Giants to offer the very real possibility of their best start to a season start since 2001.

They remained in Jacksonville to practice this week, rather than leave immediately for London, in part to install their Cardinals game plan prior to the long flight, but also to minimize the distractions associated with spending 11 days away from home base.

“I think the biggest thing for us was, we felt like it was going to be the best way to approach the week, getting them adjusted to an eastern time zone, then staying here, we have a great setup where we’re at, staying in Jacksonville,” Coach Sean McVay said. “I think it will be great for us to not have to travel quite as much, because if you do that then you end up not traveling back home, you go to London for a week.

“So we felt like this was going to be the best thing for our players. Get them adjusted, get the initial game played, really the majority of the game plan for the Cardinals in through Thursday before we travel, and then try to limit as many of the distractions that take place when you do travel that far, and get ready to play an excellent football team.”

The players seem to have embraced the set up well enough.

“It’s been nice. It’s been kind of like a mini training camp a little bit,” said quarterback Jared Goff. “You get to hang out with all the guys again. To be around the coaches some more is always fun and meeting rooms are right near our rooms. It’s kind of like training camp again. It’s nice, and it’s definitely better than flying back to California and then having to fly all the way back out to London.”

Said McVay: “I think it’s gone really well and I think, really, you look at just the first couple days of your weekly preparation, you’re just doing it in a different place. The players handled it great. We actually got a little bit of a jump on our install where we got some of the third downs in just so we can get our entire game-plan installed to our players before we travel to London tomorrow night. They did a great job coming out, having a good locked-in focus and concentration and it’s been outstanding. I think it’s been a great opportunity for us to kind of get away and continue to connect like we’ve talked about. Up to this point, it’s been exactly what we had hoped.”

Not everyone is a fan. In spite of being back near his old stomping grounds in Georgia, Rams running back Todd Gurley isn’t keen on being away from home as long as it requires a West Coast team to make the London trip.

“Not at all,” Gurley said. “I mean it’s cool playing over there. Don’t get me wrong. It’s just more the long week. Messes up a bunch of people’s schedule. I’m pretty sure y’all wanna be in y’all’ bed right now. But nah, it’s all good. It’ll be love. The fans over there are great.”

That said, two points of emphasis were obvious over the course of the week.

The Rams understand the 4-of-13 third-down conversion rate Sunday against the Jaguars is not sustainable moving forward. And while they aren’t panicking, clearly it’s an area they want to get cleaned up in a hurry.

Meanwhile, the chemistry between Goff and wide receiver Sammy Watkins continues to be a work in progress. Watkins has just two catches and 10 targets over the last three weeks, and even when he has been targeted it just doesn’t seem like he and Goff are on the same page.

Goff threw deep to Watkins twice against the Jaguars, but neither pass was particularly close to hitting the intended target. Watkins, a dynamic force who the Rams traded for to provide an element of athleticism and big-play ability that has been missing for years, has to become a bigger part of the offense if the Rams are to maximize their potential

“I was disappointed we didn’t hit any of those deep balls,” Goff conceded. “But the game dictated that a little bit by the way we were moving the ball on the ground.”

Said McVay: “It wasn’t necessarily not getting down the field, just connecting on those shots. You have a couple opportunities that we expect our guys to be able to make, but again, Jacksonville is one of the top pass defenses in the league for a reason. They’ve got great DBs, excellent in terms of how they match things up on the back end – played a couple different coverage principles.

“But things that we had talked about and kind of had a chance to maybe make some plays, and credit to them, we didn’t do that. But, that’s going to be a point of emphasis really every week, just being efficient in the pass game and when you get your opportunities to make some of those plays, especially off the play action and the movement, you want to try to hit a high percentage and our guys have done that. Last week was a tough one for us.”

McVay has been proactive on the Watkins and Goff front, even overseeing counseling sessions in which coach, quarterback and wide receiver hope to all get on the same page.

“We do offensive meetings and we meet consistently a lot of the times with the receivers and the quarterbacks, just talking about that rhythm and timing, that rapport,” McVay said. “It is an imperfect game, but a lot of times if things happen in the rhythm and timing of the play that we want, we have landmarks on a lot of these things. The quarterback, we tell him to read with his feet and as long as everybody is on the same page, you give yourself a chance to improve.

“I really can’t say enough, not just exclusive to Jared and Sammy, but about our players with how receptive they are with just continuing to learn, continuing to grow and get better and every game and every, really, practice provides a learning opportunity. They did a good job coming out here today.”

Those conversations, according to McVay, are open ended. And players are encouraged to speak up.

“Absolutely. We talk about it all the time as it doesn’t really matter what we know as coaches, it’s about the players,” he said. “They’re the ones out there. We want to make sure that they have an understanding and the thing that I think is really special, too, is we say certain things, but there’s a lot of dialogue that takes place between the players that I think is very healthy, where they’re the ones out there, they’re the ones communicating – there’s so much communication that goes on in the huddle that coaches aren’t exposed to and I think that’s healthy for us. But, it’s our job to be able to kind of set that table and then make sure that they understand it and then let them develop and continue to have an understanding for each other and what we’re trying to get done moving forward.”

And with that, the Rams were good. Bidding farewell to Jacksonville, their home for the past six days. Up next, London.

[www.ocregister.com]
Reply

  • Poll Poll
Dodgers in World Series! How Will This Affect Rams Fan Attention? (Poll)

How Will the Dodgers Going To The Series Affect the Rams?

  • It will generate excitement in the city for both teams! (A rising tide floats all boats)

    Votes: 26 36.6%
  • It will further pull potential fans from the Rams, delaying the increase in attendance.

    Votes: 6 8.5%
  • It will have no affect. The Rams don't play at home until Nov. 12th.

    Votes: 39 54.9%

Congratulations to the Los Angeles Dodgers on their victory tonight over the Chicago Cubs, to advance to the World Series!

Many of us surely are Dodger Fans of old. I remember the days of Garvey, Cey and Lopes, etc. Good years.

My question for you Ram fans is this: How, if at all, will the Dodgers advancing to the World Series affect the Rams, as they try to gain the love and attention of the Los Angeles fan base? Please vote in my poll, and then tell me in the comments if you are a Dodger fan, (or what is your team?) and any stories attached.

Go Dodgers! and go Rams!!

I just want to say....

I'm from WV and was never a Rams fan until Tavon and Stedman were drafted by the Rams. Then I became a huge fan. But after what happened to Stedman, and Tavon not living up to expectations, I remain a huge Rams fan and there's only one reason. It's this board and you guys and gals. I'm hooked. You all are addictive, and if is Tavon is traded I will remain a fan. Go Rams!
PS: To the Cards fans, not bloody likely! Rams 24, Cards 20.

I Finally Gave Up an Unhealthy Sports Chat Site

Along with the PD Rams forum and then later this place, I used to post at ESPN before they went to Facebook. A bunch of us from the NFC West moved to a new site and set it up essentially the same as the old ESPN site was because we liked our anonymity ....Every new story had a comment section below it and mixed NFC West crowd trolled one another with limitations imposed by ESPN. The new site had no such limitations and therefore never gained an increasing membership. because it could be brutal to any not used to it...

I like to tease. I even like to troll a little, but I finally had enough tonight. I was a MOD there, as much as that means in a trolling site like this one. I am a big proponent of free speech which is why I stayed too long there. My last post was something like "Thanks for the epiphany. I realized tonight that I have wasted hours of my life posting with nihilistic misanthropes. Give my MOD-ship to others, I won't be back."

I am glad for this place.

TNF: Chiefs@Raiders

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...s-lb-navorro-bowman-to-start-vs-chiefs-on-tnf

Raiders LB NaVorro Bowman to start vs. Chiefs on TNF
By Conor Orr

NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported Thursday that the longtime 49er, who recently battled his way out of San Francisco and onto the Raiders' roster, will be among Oakland's starting 11 Thursday night against the Chiefs. He is officially active for the game.

Bowman, a three-time Pro Bowler, adds an element of professionalism to the Raiders' linebacking corps. While the defense hinges largely on the pass rushing prowess of Khalil Mack, Bowman's ability against the run should be a welcome addition to the middle of Jack Del Rio's defense.

The Raiders (2-4) are hoping as much as they prepare to take on rookie-of-the-year frontrunner Kareem Hunt. A 2-5 hole may be too deep to climb out of, even with all their name-brand talent on both sides of the ball.

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...s-picks-from-expert-with-8-straight-nfl-wins/

Oakland Raiders vs. Kansas City Chiefs odds: Picks from expert with 8 straight NFL wins
Micah Roberts is gunning for nine straight winning NFL picks on Thursday Night Football
by CBS Sports Staff

Week 7 of the NFL season begins with "Thursday Night Football" when the Kansas City Chiefs visit the Oakland Raiders.

The Chiefs are three-point favorites, up a half-point from where the Vegas line opened. The over-under, or total number of points Vegas thinks will be scored in the game, is 46.5, down a one point from where it opened.

Before you bet on a prime-time game like this with so much NFL odds movement, you'll want to hear what Vegas legend Micah Roberts has to say.

On "Sunday Night Football," Roberts was all over the Giants +13, noting Big Blue's tendency to play well on the road. The result: Giants 23, Broncos 10, a shocking upset and a huge 26-point cover. It was his eighth straight winning NFL pick. That's almost unheard of.

Part of his success: He ran Vegas sportsbooks for 13 years. When a line is off and there's value created by the house trying to generate action on one side, Roberts sees it instantly.

Roberts knows these two teams are coming off disastrous Sundays. The Chiefs suffered their first loss of the season at home against the underdog Steelers, while the Raiders lost their fourth straight in another sluggish performance, this time against the Chargers.

The Raiders have regressed considerably. Last season, they were No. 7 in yards and points. This season, they rank No. 30 in offense with only 278 yards per game. They are No. 24 in rushing yards at just 93.7 per game and have scored an average of 13 points per game the past four weeks. They haven't had a running back top 80 yards this season.

But just because the Raiders have been struggling doesn't mean the Chiefs cover, especially on the road on a short week against a division rival.

Despite missing a week, Raiders quarterback Derek Carr is still in the top half of the league in touchdowns (eight), has a top-10 rating (93.9) and is No. 4 in completion percentage (68.3 percent). And wide receiver Michael Crabtree is third in receiving scores (five). Defensively, Oakland is fourth in tackles (406) and held the division-rival Broncos and Chargers to 33 total points already this season.

Meanwhile, Chiefs running back Kareem Hunt hasn't found the end zone since Week 3 and is fresh off a season-low 21 yards rushing. Stud wide receiver Tyreek Hillsuffered a neck injury last week.

It's no surprise that Roberts is leaning toward the under on "Thursday Night Football," but what about against the spread, which he has made his name picking?

He knows there's a huge x-factor that ultimately determines the point spread winner for Chiefs-Raiders. And SportsLine senior analyst Larry Hartstein agrees with him.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexka...cks-for-thursday-night-football/#52528c926399

Oakland Raiders Vs. Kansas City Chiefs: Week 7 Odds And Picks For Thursday Night Football
Alex Kay

Week 7 of the 2017 NFL season will begin tonight when the Oakland Raiders host the Kansas City Chiefs on Thursday Night Football. Both AFC West rivals are looking to get back on track after losing this past Sunday.

This one has the potential to be a close contest, especially since the Chiefs just proved they were vulnerable for the first time this season. The team suffered its first defeat, bringing a previously unblemished record down to 5-1—which is still the top mark in the league—after it failed to contain the Pittsburgh Steelers’ rushing attack.

Oakland would be wise to replicate that game plan, although the team has been struggling to generate consistent offense over the past month. The club has now dropped four straight matchups and is in serious danger of missing out on a postseason appearance this year. At 2-4, the Raiders direly need to get off the schneid, but they won’t find it easy against an angry Chiefs team that they have not found a way to beat since 2014.

Oddsmakers are expecting this one to be decided by a field goal, opening betting with the Chiefs as a three-point road favorite. It’s a solid line, one that could certainly go either way tonight. If you are looking for advice on how to bet this game, you’ve come to the right place, as Jon Price of SportsInformationTraders.com is once again providing his expert opinion on the matter.

Before we get to this pro handicapper’s prediction, here’s a preview—including start time, TV information, updated odds and more—for Week 7’s Thursday Night Football battle between the Chiefs and Raiders.

Login to view embedded media View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNjEQRgPQO0

As mentioned, the Chiefs were the last remaining undefeated team going into Week 6. It figures that the Steelers—an opponent they have had a lot of trouble with in recent years—would be the ones to finally fell them.

Pittsburgh executed a smashmouth offensive attack led by superstar running back Le’Veon Bell—who racked up 179 yards and a touchdown on 32 totes—that was eerily similar to the game plan it employed during its AFC Divisional Round victory January.

If you need a refresher, the Chiefs had their most recent postseason appearance cut short by the Steelers, a disappointing finish after breaking through to win AFC West for the first time since 2010. Bell was brilliant in that game too, as the Michigan State product rushed 30 times for 170 yards, guiding his side to the AFC Championship Game on the road by steadily moving the chains during a low-scoring, defensive-oriented, field goal fiesta.

The Chiefs had clearly put that disappointing performance behind them and burst out of the gate this season, winning five in a row—including signature victories against the New England Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles—but they once again ran into a black and yellow brick wall at Arrowhead Stadium.

Fortunately for Kansas City, this loss doesn’t mark the end of its season, and now the team has a chance to pick up the pieces and move on to face a reeling Raiders squad that it has pushed around in recent years.

Since head coach Andy Reid took over the Chiefs at the start of the 2013 campaign, they have lost just once to Oakland. Chiefs also lead series since 2010, 8-6 and all-time, 62-52-2.

Why do I take "we'll be ready next game" as....

....we weren't ready those last few games.

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/258920338/astros-need-two-wins-to-go-to-world-series/
NEW YORK -- The Astros built a 10-game lead in the American League West by the end of May and ran away with the division from there. Other than what turned out to be an inconsequential battle with the Indians for the best record in the AL as the season wound down, they cruised through the regular season without being pushed by another team.

Now they're facing elimination.

The Yankees blanked the Astros, 5-0, in Game 5 on Wednesday night to take a 3-2 lead in the best-of-seven AL Championship Series presented by Camping World.

"This series isn't over," Astros manager A.J. Hinch said. "This game is. We're going to get back to Houston and get to an off-day with our families and come back ready to play."

Veteran catcher Brian McCann and veteran designated hitter Carlos Beltran -- a pair of former Yankees -- spoke up in a team meeting in the moments following the Game 5 loss, and they reminded their teammates the series is far from over. The Astros have won 15 of their past 17 at home, including the posteason.

"We'll be ready," McCann said. "This team, we've played extremely well all season long and nothing is going to change. We'll get ready for Game 6."

Beltran said he told his teammates they can't feel sorry for themselves.

"That's the mentality," he said. "I told them that it wasn't going to be easy. Even though you win the first two games, you have to understand that we're coming here to their home and they've been able to play good games here. That's what they did. They played good games, they pitched well, they were able to come through with guys in scoring position. You have to give them credit, but at the end of the day, we have to be able to, as a team, turn the page and move on to what's ahead of us."

Beltran, a 20-year veteran, was on Houston's 2004 team that carried a 3-2 National League Championship Series lead into Games 6 and 7 in St. Louis and lost both of them. He told the young guys not to get down on themselves.

"Now it's time for us to go home and play better baseball," Beltran said.

Veteran outfielder Josh Reddick said the Astros are trying to do too much at the plate. They've been outscored by 12 runs (21-9) in the series and are hitting a collective .147 in the five games, with one homer and eight RBIs. That's a far cry from the team that had the most potent offense in baseball in the regular season.

"Everybody's trying to be the one guy who can put the team on their back with one swing, and that's one thing we can't get too focused on," Reddick said. "We've got to keep the line moving. We've been so great all year chaining together hits one after another, and we've got to get back to that and just quit trying to do everything ourselves."

When asked how the team is going to respond, third baseman Alex Bregman beamed with confidence.

"We're going home, and we've got to fight back and keep fighting and do what we've done all year, and that's fight and compete and play the game hard," he said. "Our effort's been there. We've been playing the game hard the entire time we've been here, and we go home in front of our home fans with big [Justin Verlander] on the mound and show up ready to go."

They play well at home? Everybody in the playoffs does. And most of them play well on the road too. Cleveland played well at home but better on the road. They went 2-1 at home and 0-2 on the road. The Astros play well at home but better on the road. They are 2-0 at home and 0-3 on the road. And it's not like the Yankees didn't play well in Houston. They lost two 2-1 games and one ended with a little controversy from a pop up slide. But when it was all said and done, they lost 2.

But I guess what else is he supposed to say?

"We had them 2-0 going to N.Y. . We knew we played well on the road all year. We thought we'd close it out there but they beat us. Now we have to go home where we don't play quite as well as we do on the road. And winning 2 of 2 isn't going to be as easy as most think, regardless of how well Verlander pitched in game 2"?

Referees Association ticked off at claims of officiating bias

Referees have undoubtedly done a crappy job overall, not just this season but for a long time. Why else would the NFL agree to hire certain refs full-time? No one's perfect at their job but when the screw ups continue year after year then something needs to be done.

Are some refs biased towards one team and against another? Maybe but good luck proving that. I have the feeling they keep the games close by order of the NFL. Calling penalties can be very subjective with some exceptions of course when they're obvious. So the ref calls a few more on the team that's ahead and less on the team that's behind. And there you go. Would love to see some stats on that.
*************************************************************************************
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...back-at-misguided-claims-of-officiating-bias/

NFLRA hits back at “misguided” claims of officiating bias
Posted by Josh Alper on October 19, 2017

861689236-e1508428605960.jpg

Getty Images

After the Eagles beat the Panthers last Thursday night, PFT and other outlets pointed out that the Eagles had 10 penalties accepted for 126 yards in the game while the Panthers were deducted one yard on their one accepted penalty.

That wasn’t out of the norm for Eagles games officiated by referee Pete Morelli. The last four games involving the Eagles and Morelli saw Philly penalized 40 times while their opposition was penalized eight times. Eagles coach Doug Pederson was asked about it and said he thought the league was aware of that disparity.

That’s not the only history between a referee and a team that’s come up recently. Patriots quarterback Tom Brady noted referee Jerome Boger’s crew has “called much more penalties on us than the other team” after a loss to the Panthers earlier this month and all of that discussion has caught the attention of the NFL Referees Association.

They released a statement from NFLRA executive director Scott Green on Thursday hitting back at any suggestions of bias that might come from such observations and comments.

“Claims like these demonstrate a fundamental lack of knowledge about NFL officiating,” Green said. “NFL officials are graded on every call made in every game. Missing a single one can hurt his or her ranking and may be the difference between working in the postseason or not.

These recent attempts to sensationalize statistics and create click-bait headlines lack important context. Without the proper perspective, the information being pushed is completely misguided. The passion of NFL fans and teams are a big part of what makes the game so great.

However, it’s no excuse for the irresponsible and baseless claims we’ve seen lately. NFL officials are committed to upholding the integrity of the game and do so every week.”


The statement points out that declined penalties could paint a more balanced picture and that notions of historical bias don’t fit with crews that change their makeup from year to year. Both of those things are true, but they’re unlikely to make too many fans feel differently if their team is on the wrong side of a wide disparity in penalties.

PFT’s Week Seven picks

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/10/19/pfts-week-seven-picks-7/

PFT’s Week Seven picks
Posted by Mike Florio on October 19, 2017

Cardinals at Rams

MDS’s take: The Rams really look like a playoff team to me, and another division win is coming on Sunday.

MDS’s pick: Rams 27, Cardinals 13.

Florio’s take: The folks in London are getting a pretty good game, for a change. The Rams are inconsistent, and the Cardinals have gotten a boost from the arrival of Adrian Peterson.

Florio’s pick: Cardinals 23, Rams 20.
---------
Chiefs at Raiders

MDS’s take: The Raiders just aren’t a very good football team this year. The Chiefs will bounce back from their first loss with a big win.

MDS’s pick: Chiefs 28, Raiders 17.

Florio’s take: It’s rare that one of the best rivalries in football gets played when both teams are good. Currently, however, one of the teams isn’t good. The Raiders face what could eventually be an elimination game, and the Chiefs simply have too many weapons on each side of the ball, allowing them to overcome a Raiders team that has been overrated.

Florio’s pick: Chiefs 27, Raiders 20.
------------
Buccaneers at Bills

MDS’s take: The Buccaneers’ defense has been a mess this season, allowing the ancient Adrian Peterson to have a huge game on Sunday. The Bills’ running game should thrive.

MDS’s pick: Bills 28, Buccaneers 21.

Florio’s take: Jameis Winston can do everything but throw, which will make it a little hard to play quarterback. A return to Buffalo by former Bills quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrickbecomes intriguing, but the Bills have enough (especially with extra time to get ready) to continue an unlikely climb toward the postseason.

Florio’s pick: Bills 24, Buccaneers 14.
-----------
Ravens at Vikings

MDS’s take: The Ravens’ offense has been a mess, and Joe Flacco is primarily to blame. I don’t see any reason to think he’ll improve against a good Vikings defense. Minnesota is suddenly looking like the favorite in the NFC North.

MDS’s pick: Vikings 20, Ravens 13.

Florio’s take: The NFL’s pair of purple teams have had some entertaining games over the years, from a 29-26 Baltimore win in the snow four years ago to a Vikings 33-31 barnburner in the first Brett Favre year to a cluster of kick-return touchdowns during the rookie year of Randy Moss. This time around, the Vikings have balance and the home-field advantage — along with an opportunity to hit the bye at 6-2.

Florio’s pick: Vikings 30, Ravens 20.
-----------
Jets at Dolphins

MDS’s take: The Dolphins finally showed signs of life with their second-half comeback against the Falcons on Sunday. I think they’re going to keep it going against the Jets, who won’t be able to sustain their surprising early-season success.

MDS’s pick: Dolphins 24, Jets 21.

Florio’s take: The Dolphins have been through plenty of adversities, and now it’s time to inflict some adversities on other teams.

Florio’s pick: Dolphins 24, Jets 13.
----------
Jaguars at Colts

MDS’s take: Jacoby Brissett has played fairly well under the circumstances of not arriving until September. But the Jaguars’ outstanding defense is going to give him a tough time on Sunday.

MDS’s pick: Jaguars 20, Colts 6.

Florio’s take: It’s an odd-numbered week, which means that the good Jaguars will be showing up to face a Colts team that isn’t as bad as it was expected to be.

Florio’s pick: Jaguars 23, Colts 12.
---------
Saints at Packers

MDS’s take: The Saints’ defense is getting better, and it will look better still in Brett Hundley‘s first start.

MDS’s pick: Saints 21, Packers 10.

Florio’s take: We’ll find out how good of a coach Mike McCarthy is without a franchise quarterback to save his bacon. With a better coach and a franchise quarterback coming to town, the wins will have to come later.

Florio’s pick: Saints 27, Packers 21.
----------
Panthers at Bears

MDS’s take: Benching Mike Glennon for Mitch Trubisky was the right move, but that says more about how terrible Glennon is than about how ready Trubisky is. He’s going to struggle against a good Panthers defense.

MDS’s pick: Panthers 14, Bears 7.

Florio’s take: In Houston, they’ve been asking why Deshaun Watson wasn’t the Week One starter. They’ll be asking that soon in Chicago about a quarterback taken 10 spots higher. Upset alert! Upset alert! Did I mention upset alert?

Florio’s pick: Bears 27, Panthers 23.
---------
Titans at Browns

MDS’s take: The Titans are on the road, coming off a short week, and Marcus Mariota is less than 100 percent. They’re ripe for an upset. But the Browns are so bad that I just can’t see it happening.

MDS’s pick: Titans 17, Browns 13.

Florio’s take: The Browns have two chances to avoid entering the bye at 0-8 in 2017, and 1-23 since the latest reboot of the franchise. Which means that the reboot is getting closer to getting the boot.

Florio’s pick: Titans 20, Browns 9.
----------
Cowboys at 49ers

MDS’s take: The 49ers are better than their winless record suggests; they’re competitive week in and week out. And yet some teams just find a way to lose. I think that trend continues on Sunday.

MDS’s pick: Cowboys 21, 49ers 20.

Florio’s take: Once upon a time, these two teams ruled the conference. Now, one of them already is done — and the other one isn’t all that far behind.

Florio’s pick: Cowboys 30, 49ers 17.
-----------
Broncos at Chargers

MDS’s take: These two teams are trending in opposite directions. Look for the Chargers to make it three in a row.

MDS’s pick: Chargers 20, Broncos 16.

Florio’s take: Maybe the Broncos aren’t as good as we thought they were. Maybe the Chargers aren’t as bad as we thought they were.

Florio’s pick: Chargers 24, Broncos 20.
---------
Bengals at Steelers

MDS’s take: The Steelers probably have the best combination of strong offense and strong defense of any team in the league. They’ll take another big step toward control of the AFC North with a win over the Bengals

MDS’s pick: Steelers 24, Bengals 10.

Florio’s take: The Steelers have regained their swagger, and they’re not about to blow it against one of their most hated rivals.

Florio’s pick: Steelers 26, Bengals 17.
---------
Seahawks at Giants

MDS’s take: The Giants showed their first signs of life in beating the Broncos on Sunday, but the Seahawks aren’t going to let them make it two in a row.

MDS’s pick: Seahawks 20, Giants 10.

Florio’s take: Hopefully the fumes of that first win for the Giants will last a while. The Seahawks are simply too good to lose this one, and they won’t step into the same post-bye complacency pothole that took down Denver last week.

Florio’s pick: Seahawks 27, Giants 10.
---------
Falcons at Patriots

MDS’s take: The Super Bowl rematch sees both teams looking unimpressive. The Patriots’ defense is a mess, but Tom Brady is still playing well, and he should have a big game in a New England win.

MDS’s pick: Patriots 30, Falcons 20.

Florio’s take: Hair of the dog that bit you never actually cures a hangover.

Florio’s pick: Patriots 30, Falcons 23.

Washington at Eagles

MDS’s take: The Eagles are already in control of the NFC East, and if they win this one they have a chance of running away with the division. I think they’ll do just that.

MDS’s pick: Eagles 28, Redskins 20.

Florio’s take: The Eagles are moving another step closer toward nailing down the division title. The real question is whether they can cement the No. 1 seed.

Florio’s pick: Eagles 27, Redskins 20.

Top 21 Quarterbacks for the Rest of 2017 - Goff #21

https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/10/18/nfl-quarterbacks-qb-rankings

The NFL’s Top 21 Quarterbacks for the Rest of 2017
By Andy Benoit

P194fiMQ_400x400.jpg


The Aaron Rodgers injury serves as the latest reminder: In pro football, nothing is more important than quarterback play. Here are the top 21 quarterbacks in the NFL right now. (Why 21? I set out to do 20, but thought the first man on the outside looking in, Goff, was too interesting to not write about.) And by “right now” we mean, if you had to choose a QB to play with for the rest of the 2017 season-only, who would you want? Assume the QB can bring his offensive system along, but not the players around him.

21. Jared Goff, Rams: In many respects, he’s a more talented Kirk Cousins. Goff throws the seam ball well, he’s sharp on early down play-action where the reads are defined (a key facet in head coach Sean McVay’s system), he’s willing to attempt tough throws when the situation demands and, while not mobile per se, he can make the occasional play when things break down.

Even better, Goff himself is not usually the one breaking them down; he’s getting firmer from the pocket. But also like Cousins (especially a younger Cousins), Goff is prone to making the boneheaded mistake. That’s not atypical this early in a QB’s career. The Rams have a nice young head coach-quarterback tandem.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/pro-nfl-qb-rankings-by-pff-grade-after-week-6

Slide20-768x432.jpg


20. Deshaun Watson, Texans: Is five-and-a-half games too small a sample size to put Watson on this list? Probably. But if we’re talking about playing now? Defenses have yet to figure out Watson’s mobility or how to bait him into the ill-advised decisions that he already flirts with too often.

That will change, it’s just a matter of whether Watson can grow fast enough to outpace his opponents. If he doesn’t, turnovers will ensue. Watson is a nice touch passer but not a flamethrower. His future hinges on how well he commands Bill O’Brien’s scheme. O’Brien, to his credit, has tweaked that scheme to accommodate his rookie QB.

19. Joe Flacco, Ravens: He’s on the list because it doesn’t feel right to put callow QBs like Goff and Watson ahead of an accomplished 10-year vet and Super Bowl winner. But sheesh, what has happened to the Ravens’ leader? His poise and aggressiveness have abated and his decision-making often goes awry. He’s been a shell of his former, star-caliber self the past year-and-a-half.

Addendum on Flacco being one spot ahead of Watson: I’ve seen every snap from both QBs on film, and there’s no doubt that Watson has been infinitely better in 2017. Each week, Watson has gotten quicker and smoother going through his reads, but there have been cases where he’s looked like a rookie—most notably, several ill-advised throws late in the down, many of which he doesn’t have the arm strength for—and gotten away with it. If he keeps making those mistakes, at some point his luck will change. (He very well could continue to improve rapidly, in which case I’ll be the biggest idiot left standing.)

As for Flacco, I’ve always been smitten with his arm strength; I guess that’s the big-armed-pocket-passer-loving part of me that I just can’t quit. He is 32, too young to be washing up—I just can’t stop thinking he’ll turn it around. And, ultimately, I think there’s something to be said for Flacco’s decade-worth of solid tape. As for Watson, he had a shaky game-and-a-half followed by four great games. His long-term outlook is exciting, but this exercise is focused only on the remainder of his rookie year.

18. Andy Dalton, Bengals: Because he’s not great from a messy pocket and doesn’t have the biggest arm, he needs quality players around him in order to thrive. When he has that, he’s an excellent field general who can throw well between the numbers.

17. Marcus Mariota, Titans: Mariota can obviously make plays with his legs, but in Tennessee’s offense he must also be proficient throwing on first and second down (including play-action). He has a quick enough release, but you’d like to see more consistent accuracy.

16. Carson Palmer, Cardinals: He’ll continue to get the living daylights beaten out of him behind a bad Cardinals O-line and in a scheme that doesn’t leave extra men in to help pass protect. It’s incredible that Palmer keeps standing tall in the pocket and making his downfield reads. That’s why Arizona still has a fighting chance in the NFC West.

15. Dak Prescott, Cowboys: We wondered how he’d play once the perfect conditions of his rookie season disappeared. Well, this year, top receiver Dez Bryant has struggled, Dallas’s O-line has underachieved and Ezekiel Elliott has been bottled up (and could soon be serving that six-game suspension). Prescott’s response has been impressive.

He continues to be a pocket QB first, a mover second. That’s a must in pro football. When Prescott has used his legs, he’s been sensational. He’s low on this list because the sample size of games he's played without those perfect conditions (five games) is small. But if he continues this current growth, he’ll soon be top 10.

14. Russell Wilson, Seahawks: Yes, he’s hindered by a shaky O-line, and that accentuates some of his limitations as a pocket passer. If Wilson is unable to get the ball out quickly, his lack of height and vision become issues, and the play can break down. Wilson can become dangerous—really dangerous, in fact—but not if he has bouts of inaccuracy like he’s had a few times this season.

13. Philip Rivers, Chargers: Meet the NFL’s most difficult QB to reconcile. Rivers is a true field general, owning the entire offense and commanding the game at the line of scrimmage. He still has the arm to make all the throws, and, though it’s unattractive, he can create new throwing opportunities off of movement, both outside the pocket and especially inside the pocket.

And yet . . . the Chargers have suffered from perplexing turnovers and tight losses. It’s been for a variety of factors, but at some point you have to consider the quarterback’s culpability. How do you analyze a QB whose process is so much better than his team’s results?

12. Kirk Cousins, Redskins: The “and his system” stipulation on this list is critical. Cousins fits Jay Gruden’s scheme about as well as any QB fits any coach’s scheme. The slow development of wide receivers Josh Doctson and Terrelle Pryor has hurt, but Cousins understands how the system can get the ball to interior playmakers like tight ends Jordan Reed and Vernon Davis, and especially scatback Chris Thompson. Cousins still occasionally attempts throws beyond his abilities, but as a timing and rhythm passer, he’s become very sound.

11. Jameis Winston, Bucs: An intriguing old-school dropback pocket passer, no one attempts more tight-window downfield throws than the third-year pro, and often the results are positive. Naturally, though, some are negative. That creates the fine line that Winston and head coach Dirk Koetter must walk together.

10. Alex Smith, Chiefs: He’s still a game manager. However, he’s managing the best-designed offense in football. As a smart player who has been in that offense for five years, Smith has naturally become more aggressive. He doesn’t leave nearly as many throws on the field as he used to.

9. Eli Manning, Giants: Yes, he’s had a few of his patented horrendous turnovers (the sack-fumble at the end of the Chargers game comes to mind). And yes, he’s without his receivers and playing behind a questionable offensive line, which will continue to impact his performance. But Manning hasn’t suddenly forgotten how to play football, and in a quick-timed scheme like New York’s, where two-receiver route combinations can work when the defense is properly diagnosed, he’s still a QB you can win with.

8. Derek Carr, Raiders: The Raiders have underachieved, but we shouldn’t overlook Carr’s quick release and accuracy. He’s become a more decisive passer, and he has the legs to survive when indecision does set in. Quarterback is not among Oakland’s problems, which is why their problems can be resolved.

7. Cam Newton, Panthers: The plan was to give Newton more throws to running backs in hopes of improving his completion percentage. So far, it’s gone well. Newton is connecting on 64.5% of his passes—5.7 percentage points better than his career mark. He still doesn’t (and probably never will) have the consistent precision-accuracy and timing to run a full-fledged spread quick-strike game, but the Panthers don’t need him to.

They’ve incorporated Christian McCaffrey as the underneath piece in their existing deeper dropback concepts, and so Newton’s game still centers around downfield power throws, where he’s as effective as anyone. Oh, and also around his mobility, of course. The plan to run Newton less has, fortunately, fallen through. In crucial moments—third-and-medium, late in games, in the red zone, etc.—Newton’s legs become Carolina’s primary weapon.

This offense would be lost without that. His mechanical glitches still make week-to-week consistency a question. But if Newton continues to play at his current level, he’ll climb this list, just like he did in 2015.

6. Carson Wentz, Eagles: We thought before the season that Eagles head coach Doug Pederson might expand the offense to better capitalize on Wentz’s late-in-the-down playmaking prowess. He has, and Wentz has responded. You can’t teach a quarterback to keep his eyes downfield under duress the way Wentz does, and you certainly can’t teach him to make Wentz’s strong-armed throws, which can come off design or improvisation.

5. Ben Roethlisberger, Steelers: Contrary to speculation, he can still play. Even if—if—he’s not quite the physical specimen he was, his evolution into a cerebral QB, both before and after the snap, will make him a great overseer of an offense that can rely on a smashmouth ground game or spread passing game. And by the way, there isn’t a defensive coordinator in the league that doesn’t still worry about Roethlisberger’s playmaking prowess.

4. Drew Brees, Saints: Business as usual. He still gets through his progressions as efficiently as anyone, which is why New Orleans’s offensive line shuffles have not been a huge problem, and why Brees’s declining arm strength usually isn’t.

3. Matt Ryan, Falcons: Though they’re slogging through a valley right now, the Falcons under new coordinator Steve Sarkisian have mostly looked like the schematically diverse, run/pass-synchronized offense that they were under Kyle Shanahan. It helps that Sarkisian’s QB can identify the defense before the snap (Atlanta’s varied formations out of base personnel helps) and work through his progressions smoothly after it.

2. Matthew Stafford, Lions: With Aaron Rodgers shelved, Stafford right now possesses the best arm in football. His ability to throw with velocity from a variety of platforms has been the difference in a few Lions wins; no one is better on far-hash, downfield throws. Stafford actually makes it risky to play Cover 2. Plus, he continues to show more pre- and post-snap maturity in coordinator Jim Bob Cooter’s offense.

The Lions frequently line up in static formations and let their QB research the defense and tweak the play call before the snap. That’s what the Colts did in the Peyton Manning years. True, it wasn’t a great showing for Stafford against the Saints last Sunday, and yes, the Lions’ passing numbers are far from dazzling (there aren’t many weapons there). That doesn’t change the fact that Stafford’s skills have now caught up to his extraordinary talent.

1. Tom Brady, Patriots: He’s having the best season of his pretty decent 18-year career. New England’s offensive line woes have not just led to Brady getting knocked around, they’ve also forced him to move within the pocket (which he does better than anyone in history) and make throws with hits looming.

Brady has been masterful here, especially given that New England has evolved into more of a vertical passing attack. Brady’s arm strength shows no sign of decline, and his precision accuracy remains pinpoint, even under pressure.

Rams uniform changes are coming – but not before 2019 --OC Register

Rams uniform changes are coming – but not…

rams_jaguars_football_24705587-1.jpg

Los Angeles Rams wide receiver Pharoh Cooper celebrates his 103-yard touchdown return, on the opening kickoff, with Cory Littleton. left, and Malcolm Brown, right, during the first half of an NFL game against the Jacksonville Jaguars Sunday, Oct. 15, 2017, in Jacksonville, Fla. (AP Photo/Phelan M. Ebenhack)

By VINCENT BONSIGNORE | vbonsignore@scng.com | Daily News
PUBLISHED: October 18, 2017 at 1:30 pm | UPDATED: October 18, 2017 at 5:40 pm

JACKSONVILLE – Unless a future 2017 regular-season road opponent throws the Rams a curve ball, it looks like they won’t have to wear the hideous mismatched uniforms they wore against the Dallas Cowboys and Jacksonville Jaguars.

That’s the good news.

On the flip side, the major changes the Rams have planned for a fresh new look representing their move back to Los Angeles won’t happen until 2019, at the earliest, and possibly 2020 to coincide with the opening of their new stadium in Inglewood.

By NFL rule, uniform changes require a two-year notification and lock teams into that uniform for five years. The Rams have begun that process – remember, the new stadium was originally expected to be opened in 2019 – and have yet to decide whether to make the switch in 2019 or 2020.

Change is coming, which is a positive for those who hate the current color scheme. And there are plenty of haters, most of whom reside in Southern California and can’t help but connect the present jersey and pants color schemes with the years the Rams spent in St. Louis.

Just not quickly enough.

The Rams understand, which is why they changed to the old-school white and blue helmet this year and switched to their white away jerseys for home games. It was something, at least. But league rules prohibit them from going any further. There are various reasons for this, with merchandising and retail partnerships coming into play as well as the importance the NFL puts in creating a consistent global brand that fans identify teams with.

So, for the next couple of years anyway, they’ll try to make do by integrating the white and blue helmets with the carry over jerseys and pants from their St. Louis days..

That hasn’t stopped them from petitioning the league for flexibility to allow them to wear their throwback or color rush uniforms above and beyond the times NFL teams are permitted. At least for games in which they have to wear their blue jerseys.

They also requested permission to wear their throwback uniforms full time, provided they could still change to their new uniforms in 2019 or 2020.

But the league refused.

By the way, in case anyone is wondering, the throw back and color rush uniforms apply to the playoffs too.

[www.ocregister.com]

Rams are happy to be 4-2, but not content/Bonsignore

Bonsignore: Rams are happy to be 4-2, but not content

seahawks_rams_football_24660455.jpg

Los Angeles Rams quarterback Jared Goff, left, talks with head coach Sean McVay during the second half of an NFL football game against the Seattle Seahawks Sunday, Oct. 8, 2017, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill)

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — The dark clouds and wet, gloomy conditions that besieged North Florida the last couple of days lifted by the time the Rams returned to practice Wednesday in preparation for their Sunday game against the Cardinals in London.

But Florida being Florida, sooner than you could say Aaron Donald is the best defensive lineman in the NFL, daunting clouds rolled back in to add a definite shade of gray to what had mostly been blue skies.

And in a way, it offered the perfect overhead from which to view the Rams current position and frame of mind as they near the halfway point of their very telling second season in Los Angeles.

At the risk of playing the clichéd game of after-the-fact rationalizing, it’s safe to say had you asked the Rams and their fans at the beginning of training camp whether they’d accept a 4-2 start to the 2017 season, a mass rush to click the “Absolutely” link would have ensued. And, with the Rams sitting in that precise place six games in, it would be a bit disingenuous not to express satisfaction as a result.

But here’s the rub: It’s a satisfaction that comes with an asterisk. The Rams don’t feel fortunate to be 4-2. Nor lucky, fortuitous or charmed.

Quite the contrary actually.

Their asterisk represents a definite feeling of “but it should be even better,” after the stubbing of the toes that occurred in losses to Washington and Seattle. And for longtime Rams accustomed to experiencing sinking feelings this time of year, that’s, well, kind of cool.

“It just feels good to feel that way,” said defensive tackle Michael Brockers. “Even with two losses on your record, you feel like you could have won one of those games. Or both of them, and be here sitting at (6-0). And that’s a great feeling. I haven’t had that feeling in a long time.

“It feels good to not have a losing record, but also know we can be so much better.”

The Rams can’t rewrite their wrongs through the first six games of a 16-game season. The five turnovers against the Seahawks and the untimely mistakes against Washington are disappointments they just have to swallow. But you get the feeling their reaction to where they sit now creates almost the perfect position from which to attack the rest of the season.

Good but could be better. Happy but still not content. Satisfied, but …

“Happy with where we are but at the same time disappointed in some of the things that caused us to lose two of those game,” is how quarterback Jared Goff put it. “There’s definitely that, not being content and wanting more and I think that’s the sign of a great team. That’s good to see around here.”

This isn’t last year, or so many others previously, where the Rams talked about improvements or finding solutions and answers but, in the deepest part of their souls, knew those answers weren’t coming anytime soon.

Damaged rosters provided no ready-made improvements. A flawed coaching staff offered insufficient guidance or ability to fix and lead.

So while they talked a lot, it was all in lieu of real solutions or meaningful change. That isn’t the case anymore, which is why the defensive woes of early in the season were more easily accepted because there was sufficient talent on hand and a proven coach and system under coordinator Wade Phillips.

After giving up 90 points over the first 10 quarters of the season, the Rams have allowed just 39 points over the past 10 as players get more acclimated to the 3-4 defense under Phillips, and Donald continues to round into form.

“We’ve just been buying into the system and trusting the process and it’s been working,” Brockers said.

And it’s why they can be disappointed at the offensive breakdowns over the past two games that cost them the game against the Seahawks and made the one over the Jaguars closer than it should have been, but not completely disheartened.

The Rams’ woes in the red zone and difficulty converting on third downs on Sunday — they were 4 of 13 — are fixable. Not in the way it’s been in the past. In fact, the Rams have already shown enough proficiency in both areas this year — from a talent, scheme and execution level — that there’s confidence they can reclaim that previous efficiency.

“I think it’s just execution on each play,” Goff said. “I think we had some good plays on (recently) and we just didn’t quite execute them. Everyone’s a part of it. I can throw a couple of balls a little better, I think. We can do a little better running routes. But for the most part it’s just execution. And we look to bounce back in that this week.”

The Rams in the past uttered similar answers. They talked about fixing things and getting better and executing more efficiently. It all sounded great. But just like the taste of cotton candy dissolves into virtually nothing almost immediately after you take a bite, all those proclamations and promises never amounted to anything.

You don’t get the feeling that’s the case with these Rams. Their answers seem available, that execution attainable. And it’s driven by a surprisingly frank mindset.

The Rams don’t feel lucky to be 4-2, even after more than a decade of losing. If anything, there’s genuine disappointment that they aren’t 6-0. It’s a perspective that bodes well moving forward.

“Our two losses, we lost by six points and seven points,” Rams guard Rodger Saffold said. “And those are things we look at, especially as an offense, and say: ‘What could we have done better to put more points on the board? What can we do to stay on the field longer, to help out the defense?’

“And those are constant challenges that are getting us to work, day after day after day, instead of just sitting back and looking at our record like: ‘Hey, we’re doing so well.’”

[www.ocregister.com]


Filter