Peter King: MMQB - 3/5/18
- By OnceARam
- RAMS / NFL TALK
- 6 Replies
Someone take the keyboard away from this no news is news guy.
I would say that is one of a few aspects to the movie. Romance does play a part throughout as well. The movie opens with..."And the Prophet said:Wasn't King Kong about humans freaking with natural order of things, even in places where man hasn't touched?
Speaking of Kong, the 2005 movie and last year's Skull Island were really good.
Twilight isn't a "monster movie", it's a bad teen romance flick based on bad romantic YA novel.Pacific Rim is also about monsters (Japanese), but still monsters. Those are really good too. No forced romance either, not every movie has to have that, and it doesn't automatically make them good. Exhibit A: Twilight.
I’d say that he makes our defense great along with other respectable players. I would say this about probably no other defensive player and I’m not even one who values his position as a huge need for most defenses. He showed how important he is. I’d find a way to pay the man.No....truly great players make others around them better. Donald makes our defense respectable...
Yeah I was upset too. I watched him play his college ball at OSU and was jacked when we picked him.I get that. I was hurt when S-Jax left the Rams because he was - and still is - my favorite Ram.
I had to google "google" to know what you were talking about. Lol!The fact you had to google the reference is hilarious
Lol. Like it for the Rams? Of course I do. But I would also like Cleveland's 1st and 4th overall for Mark Barron. Just because I like it, doesn't make it remotely reasonable...So you don’t like it for The Rams ?
The rookie contracts now for a veterans contract is very nice.
I'm not exited about the possibility of having to spend franchise tag money on him either. I would much rather get a fair deal done.The first part is a non-sequitor - it's possible that it was a mistake to send a second for him. It's possible that the Rams' situation has changed since sending a second for him, and so it doesn't make sense to spend that much for him. Would they have sent a second if they'd have known that Woods would break out, and Kupp would be an outstanding WR his rookie season?
The full off season argument is getting old. Yes, he'll pick up more (hopefully) this offseason - but it seems that he didn't particularly improve as the season went along, when he should have been learning the offense better and better. There also seems to have been times when he gave up on his routes, which doesn't seem like something a franchise tag level player would do. I'm not sure how McVay sees his learning the system, and whether he feels that Watkins gave up on routes. McVay knows far more about it than any of us. I suspect that while he wants Watkins' talents, given limited resources he may not want to spend $16 million for another year of him.
I do agree that the 2017 Rams' offense was better for having Watkins. I'm not sure that between the likely improved production from TEs, and the improvement of young WRs already on the team, and the possible addition of someone to replace Watkins, that Sammy is going to be more valuable to the team than an upgrade to other positions made possible with the extra cap space.
I'm sure the Rams are negotiating with Watkins and would like to keep him. I'm much less confident that the Rams feel he is worth the franchise tag. It may be the case that Sammy is valuable to the Rams, but is just worth more to another team.
Yeah starting to think that as well. Just thought I'd ask since I have not had the time to go over anything besides a fast check in.I think he most likely won't land with us. I would be surprised if we used our first pick on a NT not named Vea (who almost definitely won't be available).
Listening further on, this podcast was recorded before the Marcus Peters and the Robert Quinn trades (and Tavon Austin cut), we now have cash to sign Trujo. You called him a #2 CB which I don't disagree with, so sign him? I think we can sign Joyner and Watkins AND sign Donald to a long term deal.....What you got?
I think Tru ends up signing w/ the hated Whiners. He's from NoCal. Were about to see if winning matters much to him. Or is he all about the mad cheddar
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/7530/trumaine-johnsonNo. But I think if the differential between what he's offered on the FA market and what the Rams are offering aren't too far apart, that maybe his desire to stay in LA (which is real IMO) will help a deal get done.Extreme longshot, of course. Just admitting that it's possible.
Yeah, I commented on the missing 99! Only blemish, imo.That was pretty good. He forgot to mention Aaron Donald as DPOY in the video. It would have put the exclamation point as the trifecta for teams going from bottom to first with Coach of the Year, Offensive Player of the Year and Defensive Player of the Year.
Untrue.
Josh McDaniels had accomplices in Bill Bellicheck and Bob Kraft, ie, the Patriots organization. So 1/32nd of the NFL did this. If 1/32nd of the total US population committed an act that the other 31/32nd of the population objected to, would a law/ordinance etc, be inappropriate? My answer would be that it's appropriate.
I'm thinking Woods.
Not sure with Watkins yet.
Who know though, maybe the Rams will get Kupp more touches.
Then Gurley out of the back field.
Plenty to look forward to next season.
The point here jrry is that you should watch what you are responding to. I have no problem with what you said if it was not quoting me as if I deserved the lecture. You made a pretty silly statement and that was all I was responding to. So don't give me some holier than thou finger wag. If you want to do that - direct it at someone else - or even me if I go that direction. I didn't and I don't appreciate the inference. Again - get off your high horse. I am not one to accept you wagging you finger even in my direction if I don't deserve it.My "lecture" wasn't explicitly aimed at you. If you feel you're innocent here, there's no reason to be bothered by it. Relax.
As long as it's the truth brotha, who gives a fuck? We didn't cause his peck/biceps to tear....there are worse things that could have happened.I feel like a dick saying this but I hope he could have a bit of non serious tear so we can pick him up in the 3rd/4th.
If a "Home-School Mom" is caught Talking to Herself, is she going Crazy, or just having a Parent / Teacher Conference!!?!![]()
I agree with all of this.I think in general paying a player before they realize how good they are is a nice strategy... IF you're correct. If not, you get a Tavon contract.
Re: Havenstein the reason he's the most likely target for the Rams to sign this offseason is because OTs are harder to find. And when you consider they need to go get their LT next offseason, it's clear they can't afford to enter that offseason needing bookend tackles as that's a very hard equation to solve in one offseason. Needing a LT and some interior help is also tough, but easier relatively speaking.
I think Jamon Brown is going to get better and better. But he makes more mistakes in spite of the fact he's the more talented player, and he failed when given the opportunity in camp to take the RT position.
Saffold is going to deserve top shelf money. I have no concern with them paying him, but when you look at this group over time letting him walk and retooling looks better to my eye at least.
Rams have two offseasons to solve this thing. It's like 2nd and 15, and they need to get about half the yardage to make the 2019 offseason doable.