No it didn't get fixed. And for the last time the winning % was pretty close. It was a slight improvement. Not a "fix".
OK. Whatever reality last winter was, you are seeing a different one. Hung up over numbers over actual play
But he didn't GIVE himself that name as you said. So you were wrong. Why not just admit that and say "oops my bad". WTF?
You're obsessed with telling people they are wrong. Why?
He's running with the name and the praises from the media. He proclaims himself "the king".
Dude those teams had All Stars and Hall of Fame players. If you can't tell the difference I can't help you. Did you actually SEE the Bulls on their run? Did you forget they has THREE future HOF players?
Every player you list is a HOFer, or will be or is a multiple all star LOL..........jeez!!!
Sure. So did LeBron, at least all-star level players. In both stints in Cleveland. Yet only one title
Yeah sorry that's just not true James got lambasted in the press. Again, you don't want to see it for some blind hate, but yeah he got beaten up especially after the Heat lost to the Mavs the first year he was there. He got his ass kicked the entire off season.
You don't seem to remember.
No, I do. It was similiar to what you are doing, saying that the roster was so bad there's no way he could've won in Cleveland. Greatest player every joining with two other stars to win a title.
And again with the hate word. Lol, stop labeling. I already said I don't hate the guy. Talk about being blind.
Nope. They won 50 games, 50 games, then 45 games the 3 seasons before the two 60+ win seasons. Not that complex. They ran into more complete teams in the playoffs.
Wait you mentioned the two years prior to him leaving. In 2008 they won 66 games, and in 2009 they won 61 games.
It was a terrible roster yet they made improvement? That's weird.
Are you going to apply that same stupid dumbass standard to the players you listed earlier? Yeah I didn't think so LOL.
Well maybe LeBron shouldn't be annoited as the greatest basketball player ever then. Those are the expectations.
And no, I'm not going to apply that standard. Because those dudes led their teams to multiple teams with different rosters. They earned greatest players after they won.
The Bulls got to the semis without Jordan, almost to the conference finals one year and won 55 and 47 games without him. Made the playoffs both years.
Won titles with him. That's why MJ23 is the greatest. LeBron....even WITH the Heat didn't on the first time, and in both stints with the Cavaliers. Once.
MJ didn't constantly come up short, though.
The Cavs after Lebron left after taking them to the finals, 19-63, then 21 and 24 wins the next two years.
Hey, I'm not arguing he's not good. I'm just saying he's not the greatest ever.
The Heat.......... lost in two trips to the playoffs, semis and first round, and missed the playoffs the other two.
OK. Again I'm not saying he isn't good or great.
You aren't going to let go of your silly bias. That's fine.
But don't make up stuff to run for cover.
And stop trolling. I like to have conversation about my second favorite sport and I love hoops.
You either don't, or only have a surface understanding of the game.
There it is. Get butthurt over my view and make passive aggressive comments about me being a troll instead.
There really isn't any point discussing this or anything with you any more. Anytime someone doesn't share the same view point, you seem to throw a fit and insist they are wrong.
So yeah, LeOverrated. Sorry not sorry that bothers you.
