• To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

What Rams can learn from Jets' uniform redesign

It's 100% or more better than the Jets unis...those are gawd awful.

When it comes to numbers, I just want to be able to tell if #16, 18 or 19 caught the ball. It always seems like the various fonts make the 6, 8 and 9 numbers so close that with one wrinkle in the jersey, you can't tell what the number is. The number should be clear.

that's my only beef with it, really.

When it comes to the Rams unis, they better not remove the horns from the sleeves. They messing with something if some millennial designer who's never even heard of Tom Mack, Merlin Olsen, Bob Waterfield, Norm Van Brocklin, Elroy Hirsch, Roman Gabriel, Lamar Lundy, or Coy Bacon... decides to "Jet" us... well, we'll have to get out the torches...

frankenstein_villagers488_21.jpg

(and of course, that's from Young Frankenstein)

Jets new uniforms

@IowaRam I hope you are wrong about having Los Angeles across the front, that will look like crap.
I hope I'm wrong to

I wouldn't change much at all to the throwbacks we got now

I would widen the horns on the helmets...........just a bit

I would daken the blue jerseys ...................just a bit

I would lighten the blue on the helmets...............just a bit

redesign the team logo on the sleeve .................that would be the biggest redesign for 2020

ditto with the white jerseys

So, is this gonna be a 2nd consecutive “redshirt” draft?

Matthews will flex between EDGE and ILB (for passing plays). That means there are probably only 2 positions open to competition this year. ILB and NT/DT (Brockers flexing to the other). I hope Kiser fills the ILB and the draft fills the NT/DT position. OL and CB depth will also be key in this draft.

With Both our starting corners UFA's next yr. & the top back up outside corner HIll also being a UFA ......nothing but UDFA & WWC's left......the need to get some talented corners in here to groom has to be a priority. That's one reason I see a trade out of the first round to gather up another 2nd day draft selection.

Men identifying as women in sporting competition

You are an old white guy. What do you think you sound like?

A 22 year old Asian guy writing code LOL. A 30 year old black guy writing rap songs?

A 40 year old Mexican landscaper?

We are old white guys hahahahaha.

Nothing wrong with that diversity. It's OK to have those characteristics.



Well, frankly, they didn't have to remove the nips to accomplish that.

That's some delusional shot right there.


Well, technically, I'm an old red/white guy. I prefer to just be called a Haole though.

Why some animals dress up, start fires and have sex just for fun

https://nypost.com/2019/04/06/why-some-animals-dress-up-start-fires-and-have-sex-just-for-fun/


Why some animals dress up, start fires and have sex just for fun
By Mary Huhn

April 6, 2019 | 9:43am


Enlarge Image
190405-bonobos.jpg

iStockphoto
MORE ON:
ANIMALS
Even pandas can be awkward on first dates

Feds support native tribe’s push for only whale hunt in US

How 'Pet Sematary' transformed shelter cats into zombie beasts

Couple reunited with dog feared lost to massive Brooklyn blaze
In 2007, a 15-year-old chimpanzee named Julie started sporting a stiff blade of grass behind one ear — a trend that drove her fellow apes wild.

First, her son donned his own ear ornament, followed by eight other chimps in Julie’s troop of 12, who all lived in a sanctuary in Zambia.

When Julie died in 2012, her local gang kept wearing the single-blade accessory, and the style eventually spread to fashion-forward chimps in two nearby populations.

Julie and her fellow fashionistas were likely copying each other “just to be in with the in-crowd,” writes Adam Rutherford in his book, “Humanimal: How Homo Sapiens Became Nature’s Most Paradoxical Creature — A New Evolutionary History” (The Experiment), out now.

They’re not the only beasts to display human-like behavior — whether it’s a creative use of tools, enjoying recreational sex or harnessing fire, it turns out that animals are often just like us.

It’s well known that chimpanzees use sticks to dig termites out of holes, but many other creatures also get smart in the quest for tasty snacks. As recently as 150 years ago “we thought we were the only organism to use tools,” Rutherford told The Post. “But now we know 1 percent of species do.”

Take bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Australia. These resourceful sea mammals wrap live sponges around their beaks to scrounge for spiky bottom feeders. Crows — no bird brains — use sticks as hooks to root out grubs. “That shows an astonishing level of analogical reasoning which allows them to think a few steps ahead,” Rutherford said.

Australian birds of prey will pick up burning sticks from a bushfire and drop them in a dry grassy area to ignite a blaze — then await the dinner bell as small animals flee.

These pyromaniac hawks could explain why wildfires often start in odd places. “It’s also possible Australians learned to start fires from so-called firehawks,” said Rutherford. “It’s insane.”

Meanwhile, don’t assume that humans are the only animals having sex for fun. Fornication among the horniest creatures on the planet — bonobo primates from the Congo Basin — is “unmatched among animals, including us,” said Rutherford.

Bonobos engage in some type of sex act an exhausting 10 times a day yet have babies just once every five or six years. A bonobo bundle of joy comes along only once out of 18,250 sex acts, while humans conceive roughly once out of every 1,000 acts of heterosexual intercourse.

“Bonobos are very weird,” said Rutherford. “They’ve been isolated on the left bank of the Congo River for more than a million years. All social engagements involve some sort of sexual congress.” Sex — including same-sex sex — is used for greetings, resolving conflicts, asserting the social hierarchy or just showing excitement over a meal.

“It’s proper science,” Rutherford noted, “but it’s pretty entertaining.”

Los Angeles Rams Head Coach Sean McVay: “We absolutely want to sign CB Marcus Peters to extension”

Just curious - why does Peters have to prove himself when he was one of the best CBs in the NFL from week 12 through the Super Bowl? He was also very good for the first three weeks.

For me, that was him proving himself. He's probably not a number one CB - but he's a great number two.
My guess is Peters thinks he is a number 1 corner and will be looking for number 1 $$$.

Hypothetical question

I think the Chiefs would have won, and by considerably more than 10. The blueprint for how to shut-down the Rams without Gurley was there, even for a bad Chiefs defense. With a struggling offense we might have been overwhelmed. I would have been at peace with that. I want the Rams to win but I also want to be entertained.

The 11 NFL quarterbacks who could get mega extensions in 2019

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/26427917/the-11-nfl-quarterbacks-get-mega-extensions-2019
The 11 NFL quarterbacks (GOFF) who could get mega extensions in 2019

Bill BarnwellESPN Staff Writer

It's difficult to overstate just how important quarterback contracts are to success in the NFL. Finding a valuable quarterback on a rookie deal has been the league's Holy Grail since the NFL instituted a draft slotting system in the collective bargaining agreement in 2011. Maximizing the time teams get to spend with those passers helps, but even once they get paid market value, franchises build their rosters and their futures around the contract of the guy they have under center.

Typically, we see about five to six quarterbacks sign multiyear extensions during a calendar year. This year is likely going to be an exception. I don't think everyone I'm going to mention below will sign a deal over the next eight months, but as many as 11 quarterbacks could be in line to sign multiyear deals in 2019. One or more of them will be record-setting extensions in one way or another.

Let's run through those quarterbacks and their track records, and look at how their organizations typically conduct negotiations and structure contracts to try to get a sense of what they might expect to sign in the months to come. And let's start with the guy who just set a Tax Day deadline for his deal. ...

8. Jared Goff, Los Angeles Rams
Remaining on his contract: Two years, about $28 million in cash ($8.9 million cap hit in 2019, about $24 million cap hit in 2020)

It's more plausible that the Rams will get a deal done with Goff. Under GM Les Snead, they have been the most aggressive team in football with regards to locking up their first-round picks after three seasons. The Rams re-signed Robert Quinn after three seasons before the 2014 campaign, extended Tavon Austin before the 2016 season began, then gave Todd Gurley a massive new extension during the summer of 2018.

The Gurley deal contextualizes just how the Rams are willing to reward key contributors. After breaking out with an impressive 2017 campaign, the team still had Gurley under contract for one more year on his rookie deal before a fifth-year option and a possible franchise tag at a position where the top of the market was totally stagnant. In all, L.A. could have gone year to year with a player who had a torn ACL in his past and paid less than $30 million over three seasons. In Gurley's extension, though, the Rams handed Gurley $40 million in practical guarantees over that same time frame. One year later, while he played at a high level when healthy in 2018, there are reports that his left knee is arthritic.

The Rams could go year to year with Goff, who would make about $60 million or so over the next three campaigns. The Gurley extension suggests they aren't worried about paying market value to a player if they think he's a star, even if it means giving away their leverage in the process. The Rams seem hypersensitive to any argument that they might move on from their franchise quarterback. It would hardly be shocking if they came to terms with Goff on an extension this offseason, although with less than $4 million in cap space, they would have to get creative with the structure of the deal.

What his new deal could look like: Five years, $155 million with $54 million guaranteed at signing

L.A. would likely need to hand Goff a relatively small signing bonus with a larger option bonus due in the second year of his deal, which is similar to the structure of Brandin Cooks' extension. Cooks got just a $7 million signing bonus and $11 million in Year 1 of his deal, but the Rams guaranteed Cooks' $17 million option bonus for 2019 at signing as the second installment of a bonus. The structure of Cooks' five-year, $81 million deal leaves the former Saints and Patriots wideout practically guaranteed to recoup $50.5 million over three seasons.

With Goff, the structure would be the same, but the dollar figures would be higher. The Rams could keep his 2019 cap figure low by offering a $6 million signing bonus and a $3 million base salary, which would keep his 2019 charge modest at $8.8 million. L.A. also would guarantee Goff's option bonus for 2020 at $35 million and pay him an additional $6 million roster bonus on the day that option guarantees. Throw in a $4 million base salary for 2020 and we're looking at $54 million over two seasons for him. The structure of the deal would make it difficult for the Rams to get rid of Goff before 2022 at the earliest, but it's pretty clear they're all-in with him as their star passer.

So, PI is now reviewable

The real can of worms will be OPI. It's the least enforced penalty in the league - so the NFL will have to define it at some point so that refs can actually call it correctly - I've seen varying degrees of a WR "extending his arm" and pushing off and most of it doesn't get called
Well, like all replay it will have an affect on the rule it is intended for and the bad or non calls for that infraction. Because PI is now reviewable, it will have to be more clearly defined. A good thing. Because it is reviewable, the players will have to adjust knowing the things they do will now be seen and be overturned. A good thing. I don't care why it is happening. The refs can't see everything and will never always make the correct choices. So this will help that. As far as exploiting this, as a coach, I would be a lot less likely to blow a challenge on uncertainty and hang on to one for the strong likelyhood I was going to get jobbed on a PI call.

NFL 100 Year Season: Rams greatest play in history

The TD forced the Bucs to score a TD of their own though.

If you remember they were deep in Rams territory (I just looked it up they were at the 22) and King took a sack that moved them back 13 yards.

At 1:25 to go in the 4th on first down the Bucs are NOT passing if they are down 8-6. They are running a couple of times until the clock winds down then calling a TO and kicking a short FG.

The Rams went for 2 after the TD in order to extend the lead to 7 points just in case.
Yep, you are right....I would hope they wouldn't have let King past their own 30 yard line if Wilkins was forced to make it.....but yep, they drove it down there.

Rams boast strong secondary but DB is still a need in 2019 NFL draft

I see you have a Dog in this hunt.:wabbit:;) I would prefer a taller longer larger corner, but this Bulldog can hunt!

With this new rule change on PI teams are going to be fishing on key plays and praying there's enough holding and tugging to get a call. So IMO the natural stickiness some DBs have is going to be more coveted. Baker's one of those guys, he can just cling on dudes without all the grabbing and pulling.

C Garrett Bradbury NC State

I don't think we can really read into the visits too much. Teams notoriously don't have visits from guys they are highest on and do the subterfuge thing. Didn't the Rams do that with Gurley?

Probably better to focus on the guys who fit our scheme and who played well during Senior Bowl practices. That tends to be the combo that Les goes with regardless of whether we actually interviewed them. Bradbury not being on the list might mean they think he's gone or they don't want to tip their hand, even though I am sure if a team wants him they'll be looking to trade ahead of us from round 2 to snap him up. And of course that goes for some of the edge or DL fits like Lawrence.

This is why I think if a guy they really want gets close enough a trade up could happen. And of course a move down if they don't think the dropoff is all that great.

My point for McCoy is he fits all the boxes.
It is always interesting how they go about things. I’m not a big fan of trading up unless it makes sense. To me trading up for Goff & not trading back with the Greg Robinson picks I was not a big fan of.The timing for Goff was right though.
Trading back for Ogletree I liked & trading up for Joyner I didn’t. Can’t believe The Rams franchised Joyner. Actually I can because The Rams needed bodies, then the trades for Talib & Peters happened.

Filter