Hill still starter

[brandonk2293]

According to Fisher Hill is still starter once he returns from injury.

 

[AnarchyRam]

According to Fisher Hill is still starter once he returns from injury.

 

[MTRamsFan]

According to Fisher Hill is still starter once he returns from injury.

That could be awhile! Quad injuries take time to heal properly.

 

[The Rammer]

According to Fisher Hill is still starter once he returns from injury.

 

[CGI_Ram]

I tend to agree with this decision.

But happy Davis is someone we can count on.

 

[RamBall]

Hopefully AD can make it hard for Fisher to decide that Hill is healthy enough to play.

 

[RFIP]

I agree with that too.

You can't over react or you will have to answer the same question next week if Davis loses to Dallas.

This won't be popular but I like Hill's game better than Davis as far as challenging the defense down the field.

Now if you want to argue that the OL simply can;t hold up and we need a guy who can run for his life then we can have that conversation.

 

[ChrisW]

I agree with this. Hill is still the veteran, and was playing well until the INT last week. Davis played well, but still hasn't thrown a TD. He's shown to be a competent backup.

 

[V3]

I had a feeling he'd do that. Coaches are so stubborn. I really don't get the thinking on this. Hill isn't going to win you the SB so see what you have in Davis. This actually pisses me off.

 

[ShaneFalco]

there is like 3 threads on this.

 

[Killgasm]

 

[CGI_Ram]

I agree with that too.

You can't over react or you will have to answer the same question next week if Davis loses to Dallas.

This won't be popular but I like Hill's game better than Davis as far as challenging the defense down the field.

Now if you want to argue that the OL simply can;t hold up and we need a guy who can run for his life then we can have that conversation.

^ this.

 

[-X-]

I agree with that too.

You can't over react or you will have to answer the same question next week if Davis loses to Dallas.

This won't be popular but I like Hill's game better than Davis as far as challenging the defense down the field.

Now if you want to argue that the OL simply can;t hold up and we need a guy who can run for his life then we can have that conversation.

I like Hill too, but I saw no issues with Davis challenging the defense deep today.

 

[jrry32]

I don't know. I guess I can't disagree but if Hill struggles, they should go to Davis.

 

[Lesson]

I don't know. I guess I can't disagree but if Hill struggles, they should go to Davis.

Agreed. Hill's performance last week wasn't one that should result in him losing a job as a starting QB. I'm just happy, granted it's a small sample size, that it appears the Rams have a relatively young QB who could be a capable backup next season, regardless of Bradford's situation.

 

[Mojo Ram]

I'm not sure about this decision. I just hope that the Fish doesn't succumb to the old stubborn HC if Hill struggles.

 

[simonblaze]

I have no doubt Hill's play can match if not exceed what AD did today. The one big thing Hill gives us that Davis doesnt is the arm strength to throw the deep ball

 

[the zohan]

Not sure how to feel on this. If Hill gets hurt you still have Davis. But if Davis gets hurt how many games would we have with Hill?

 

[DaveFan'51]

Fisher believes that a player shouldn't lose his starting position because of an injury, I accept that. And after today I have no fears of Davis being the Back-up!